Literature DB >> 33835293

Real-world analysis of clinical and economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) in Ireland.

L M McSorley1, M Tharmabala2, F Al Rahbi3, K McSorley4, S Chew2, D Evoy4, J G Geraghty4, R S Prichard4, J Rothwell4, D P McCartan4, E W McDermott4, M Keane5, M J Kennedy6, S O'Reilly7, S J Millen8, J P Crown2, L M Smyth2,9, C M Kelly10, C M Quinn3,11, J M Walshe2,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Results from TAILOR-X suggest that up to 70% of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) node-negative (N0) ESBC patients (pts) may avoid chemotherapy (CT) with RS ≤ 25. We assess clinical and economic impacts of RS testing on treatment using real-world data.
METHODS: From October 2011 to February 2019, a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study was conducted of HR+ N0 ESBC pts who had RS testing in Ireland. Pts were classified low risk (RS ≤ 25) and high risk (RS > 25). Clinical risk was calculated. Data were collected via electronic patient records. Cost data were supplied by the National Healthcare Pricing Regulatory Authority.
RESULTS: 963 pts. Mean age is 56 years. Mean tumour size is 1.7 cm. 114 (11.8%), 635 (66%), 211 (22%), 3 (0.2%) pts had G1, G2, G3 and unknown G, respectively. 796 pts (82.8%) low RS, 159 (16.5%) high RS and 8 pts (0.7%) unknown RS. 263 pts (26%) were aged ≤ 50 at diagnosis; 117 (45%) had RS 0-15, 63 (24.5%) 16-20, 39 (15.3%) 21-25 and 40 (15.2%) RS 26-100. 4 pts (1.5%) had unknown RS. Post-RS testing, 602 pts (62.5%) had a change in CT decision; 593 changed to hormone therapy (HT) alone. In total, 262 pts received CT. Of pts receiving CT; 138 (53%) had RS > 25, 124 (47%) had RS ≤ 25. Of pts aged ≤ 50, 153 (58%) had high clinical risk, of whom 28 had RS 16-20. Assay use achieved a 62.5% change in treatment with 73% of pts avoiding CT. This resulted in savings of €4 million in treatment costs. Deducting assay costs, savings of €1.9 million were achieved.
CONCLUSION: Over the 8 years of the study, a 62.5% reduction in CT use was achieved with savings of over €1,900,000.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Clinical risk; Decision impact; Economic impact; Oncotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33835293     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06211-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  34 in total

Review 1.  Side effects of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  C L Shapiro; A Recht
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

Authors:  F Cardoso; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; I T Rubio; S Zackrisson; E Senkus
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Treatment of axillary lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: updated findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project clinical trials.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Stewart Anderson; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Torsten O Nielsen; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Herbert Stöger; Raimund Jakesz; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Otto Dietze; Peter Regitnig; Christine Gruber-Rossipal; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Christian F Singer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Peter Dubsky; Thomas Bauernhofer; Michael Hubalek; Michael Knauer; Harald Trapl; Christian Fesl; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; J Wayne Cowens; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Hazard of recurrence and adjuvant treatment effects over time in lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  James J Dignam; Vanja Dukic; Stewart J Anderson; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in contemporary clinical trials: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hadar Goldvaser; Domen Ribnikar; Habeeb Majeed; Alberto Ocaña; Eitan Amir
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P Dubsky; J C Brase; R Jakesz; M Rudas; C F Singer; R Greil; O Dietze; I Luisser; E Klug; R Sedivy; M Bachner; D Mayr; M Schmidt; M C Gehrmann; C Petry; K E Weber; K Fisch; R Kronenwett; M Gnant; M Filipits
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical validation of the EndoPredict test in node-positive, chemotherapy-treated ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM 9906 trial.

Authors:  Miguel Martin; Jan C Brase; Lourdes Calvo; Kristin Krappmann; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Karin Fisch; Amparo Ruiz; Karsten E Weber; Blanca Munarriz; Christoph Petry; Cesar A Rodriguez; Ralf Kronenwett; Carmen Crespo; Emilio Alba; Eva Carrasco; Maribel Casas; Rosalia Caballero; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Mariya Yordanova; Saima Hassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.