Literature DB >> 26598746

Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.

Mark N Levine1, Jim A Julian2, Philippe L Bedard2, Andrea Eisen2, Maureen E Trudeau2, Brian Higgins2, Louise Bordeleau2, Kathleen I Pritchard2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on decision-making in a population-based cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with axillary node-negative or nodal micrometastases, estrogen receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer being considered for chemotherapy were eligible. All cancer treatment centers in Ontario, Canada, participated. Oncologists made a preliminary recommendation for endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy on the basis of Adjuvant! Online (AOL) risk estimation. Patients were asked for their preference regarding chemotherapy. After RSs were available, patients returned for final decision-making. Patient satisfaction was measured by using the decisional conflict scale.
RESULTS: Between January 2012 and July 2013, 1,000 patients were recruited. RSs were available for 979 patients. In 58% of patients, risk was categorized as low (RS, 0 to 18); in 33%, intermediate (RS, 19 to 30); and in 9%, high (RS, ≥ 31). Oncologists' recommendations pretest and post-test remained the same in 464 patients (48%), changed from unsure or chemotherapy to no chemotherapy in 365 (38%), and changed from unsure or no chemotherapy to chemotherapy in 143 (15%). After the test, oncologists recommended chemotherapy for 236 patients, 81% of whom received chemotherapy. Of 151 patients in whom risk was classified as intermediate by means of AOL, 41% were a low risk and 44% intermediate risk with RS. Of 298 patients at high risk with AOL, 16% had a high risk RS. None of 236 patients with grade I tumors had a high-risk RS. Mean total decisional conflict scale score significantly improved from pretest to post-test from 34 to 19 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The RS substantially influenced both oncologists' recommendations and patients' preferences for chemotherapy. The major effect was avoidance of chemotherapy when AOL indicated high or intermediate risk.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598746     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.8503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Clinical utility of multigene profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Chang; L H Souter; S Kamel-Reid; M Rutherford; P Bedard; M Trudeau; J Hart; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chalanda N Evans; Noel T Brewer; Susan T Vadaparampil; Marc Boisvert; Yvonne Ottaviano; M Catherine Lee; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Joanne F Chou; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Uptake of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer practice: views of academic and community-based oncologists.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; S Dhesy-Thind; C Charles; M Hammond Mobilio; N B Leighl; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  First Prospective Multicenter Italian Study on the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Adjuvant Clinical Decisions for Patients with ER Positive/HER2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Dieci; Valentina Guarneri; Tommaso Giarratano; Marta Mion; Giampaolo Tortora; Costanza De Rossi; Stefania Gori; Cristina Oliani; Laura Merlini; Felice Pasini; Giorgio Bonciarelli; Gaia Griguolo; Enrico Orvieto; Silvia Michieletto; Tania Saibene; Paola Del Bianco; Gian Luca De Salvo; PierFranco Conte
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-13

6.  The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Monica Gonzalez-Loperena; Edi Brogi; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Impact of Recurrence Score on type and duration of chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  K Willemsma; W Yip; N LeVasseur; K Dobosz; C Illmann; S Baxter; C Lohrisch; C E Simmons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Susan T Vadaparampil; Susan Eggly; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Breast carcinoma with an Oncotype Dx recurrence score <18: Rate of distant metastases in a large series with clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Hannah Y Wen; Melissa Krystel-Whittemore; Sujata Patil; Fresia Pareja; Zenica L Bowser; Maura N Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Clifford A Hudis; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions for Women with Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Sofia Torres; Maureen Trudeau; Sonal Gandhi; Ellen Warner; Sunil Verma; Kathleen I Pritchard; Teresa Petrella; Mark Hew-Shue; Calvin Chao; Andrea Eisen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.