| Literature DB >> 29364933 |
Viviana Lazzarotto1, Françoise Médale1, Laurence Larroquet1, Geneviève Corraze1.
Abstract
The effects of replacing fishmeal and fish oil with a plant-based diet were studied in juvenile (10g) and ongrowing (250-350g) rainbow trout from first-feeding. Feed-related differences in the intestinal and hepatic transcriptome were examined in juveniles after 7 months of feeding at 7°C. Based on microarray results obtained for juveniles, the expression of selected genes related to lipid, cholesterol and energy metabolisms, was assessed by RT-qPCR in ongrowing trout after 6 additional months of feeding at 17°C. Plasma glucose and cholesterol, lipid content and fatty acid profile of whole body were analyzed at both stages. After 7 months at 7°C, all juveniles reached the same body weight (10g), while at 13 months ongrowing fish fed the totally plant-based diet exhibited lower body weight (234 vs 330-337g). Body lipid content was higher in juveniles fed the totally plant-based diet (13.2 vs 9.4-9.9%), and plasma cholesterol was about 2-times lower in trout fed the plant-based diets at both stages. Fatty acid profile mirrored that of the respective diet, with low proportions of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish fed plant-based diets. Genes involved in protein catabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and trafficking were down-regulated in the intestines of juveniles fed the plant-based diets. This was not true for ongrowing fish. Genes involved in lipid and cholesterol metabolisms were up-regulated in the livers of fish fed plant-based diets for both stages. In this study, feeding trout a totally plant-based diet from first-feeding affect a relatively low proportion of metabolism-related genes. In the longer term, when fish were reared at a higher temperature, only some of these changes were maintained (i.e. up-regulation of lipid/cholesterol metabolism). Although the plant-based diets tested in this study had no major deficiencies, small adjustments in the feed-formula are needed to further optimize growth performance while sparing marine resources.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29364933 PMCID: PMC5783356 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Ingredients and composition of the experimental diets.
| M | C | V | M | C | V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn gluten | 0.0 | 13.2 | 24.0 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 18.0 |
| Soybean meal 48 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 4.3 |
| Wheat gluten | 0.0 | 10.0 | 22.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 12.1 |
| Soy protein concentrate | 0.0 | 10.2 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 18.1 |
| White lupin | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| Peas | 0.0 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.9 | 2.4 |
| Rapseed meal 00 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 9.8 |
| Extruded whole wheat | 21.1 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 30.1 | 7.2 | 2.8 |
| Rapeseed oil | 0.0 | 8.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 7.3 |
| Linseed oil | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.3 |
| Palm oil | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| Min.-Vit. premix | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Soy lecithin | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| L-lysine | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.5 |
| L-methionine | 0.0 | 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| CaHPO4.2H20 (18% P) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 |
| Attractant mix | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Dry matter (DM, %) | 94.3 | 95.3 | 95.5 | 93.8 | 95.2 | 95.0 |
| Crude protein | 48.9 | 53.3 | 52.9 | 44.4 | 46.3 | 47.2 |
| Crude fat | 21.5 | 22.1 | 21.8 | 22.0 | 24.2 | 24.5 |
| Starch | 20.5 | 11.5 | 8.2 | 20.0 | 11.5 | 8.0 |
| Energy (kJ/g DM) | 23.0 | 24.2 | 24.1 | 23.9 | 24.3 | 25.1 |
| Total sterols | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.41 |
*Origin co-fishery products—all species
** Origin co-fishery products—sardines
*** Min.-Vit. premix: Mineral premix (g or mg kg−1 diet): calcium carbonate (40% Ca), 2.15 g; magnesium oxide (60% Mg), 1.24 g; ferric citrate, 0.2 g; potassium iodide (75% I), 0.4 mg; zinc sulphate (36% Zn), 0.4 g; copper sulphate (25% Cu), 0.3 g; manganese sulphate (33% Mn), 0.3 g; dibasic calcium phosphate (20% Ca, 18% P), 5 g; cobalt sulphate, 2 mg; sodium selenite (30% Se), 3 mg; KCl, 0.9 g; NaCl, 0.4 g (UPAE, INRA).
Vitamin premix (IU or mg kg−1 diet): DL-a tocopherol acetate, 60 IU; sodium menadione bisulphate, 5 mg; retinyl acetate, 15,000 IU; DL-cholecalciferol, 3000 IU; thiamin, 15 mg; riboflavin, 30 mg; pyridoxine, 15 mg; B12, 0.05 mg; nicotinic acid, 175 mg; folic acid, 500 mg; inositol, 1000 mg; biotin, 2.5 mg; calcium pantothenate, 50 mg; choline chloride, 2000 mg (UPAE, INRA).
M: marine FM-FO-based diet
C: commercial-like FM-FO & plant-based diet
V: experimental 100% plant-based diet
Proportions of the main fatty acids (% of total FA) in experimental diets.
| M | C | V | M | C | V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.8 | 20.9 | 18.5 | 26.6 | 18.2 | 17.6 | |
| 33.2 | 41.9 | 38.3 | 28.9 | 42.9 | 37.9 | |
| 18:2 n-6 | 3.2 | 12.5 | 21.5 | 2.9 | 12.0 | 21.4 |
| 20:4 n-6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| | 4.3 | 13.1 | 21.5 | 4.3 | 12.8 | 21.4 |
| 18:3 n-3 | 1.1 | 4.8 | 21.3 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 22.7 |
| 18:4 n-3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 |
| 20:5 n-3 | 11.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 14.7 | 8.3 | 0.0 |
| 22:5 n-3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 |
| 22:6 n-3 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 9.9 | 5.5 | 0.0 |
| | 23.3 | 18.1 | 21.3 | 30.8 | 21.4 | 22.7 |
M: marine FM-FO-based diet
C: commercial-like FM-FO & plant-based diet
V: experimental 100% plant-based diet
SAT: saturated fatty acids
MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid
PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid
Primer sequences of genes selected for analysis by RT-q PCR.
| Gene | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSZ | 60 | ||
| CTSS | 60 | ||
| FAAH | 60 | ||
| CYP51A1 | 60 | ||
| HMGCR | 60 | ||
| DHCR7 | 60 | ||
| MDH2 | 60 | ||
| COX5B | 60 | ||
| COX7A2L | 60 | ||
| Elovl2 | 59 | ||
| Elovl5 | 59 | ||
| Δ6-desaturase | 59 | ||
| EF1α | 59 | ||
| β-actin | 59 |
CTSZ, cathepsin Z; CTSS, cathepsin S; FAAH, fatty acid amide hydrolase; CYP51A1, cytochrome P450, family 51, subfamily A, polypeptide 1; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; DHCR7, 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase; MDH2, malate dehydrogenase 2, NAD (mitochondrial); COX5B, cytochrome c oxidase, subunit Vb; COX7A2L, cytochrome c oxidase, subunit VIIa polypeptide 2 like; Elovl2, polyunsaturated fatty acid elongase 2; Elovl5, polyunsaturated fatty acid elongase 5; Δ6-desaturase, delta-6-desaturase; EF1α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 alpha 1; β-actin, beta actin.
Fig 1Survival during the first (on the left) and the second period (on the right) of the feeding trial.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Fish survival is expressed as % of survivors in relation to the initial number of fish in each tank, at each experimental period. *, statistically significant differences between V- vs C- and M-fed fish (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).
Fig 2Body weight of rainbow trout during the first (on the left) and the second period (on the right) of the feeding trial.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Fish were bulk weighed every 3 weeks during the whole duration of the feeding trial. *, statistically significant differences between V- vs C- and M-fed fish (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05).
Fig 3Plasma metabolites in juveniles and ongrowing fish (g/L).
Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 16 individuals /dietary treatment for juveniles; n = 15 individuals/dietary treatment for ongrowing fish). Differences between diets were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Values that do not share a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05), with lower and upper case letters indicating differences between dietary groups within juveniles and ongrowing fish, respectively.
Total lipid whole body content (% of fresh weight) and proportions (% of total FA) of the main fatty acids in juveniles and ongrowing fish.
| M | C | V | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 9.40b | 0.38 | 9.94b | 1.52 | 13.20a | 0.88 | ||
| 24.7a | 0.4 | 18.2b | 0.5 | 16.5c | 1.1 | ||
| 34.1c | 0.3 | 42.8a | 0.1 | 39.1b | 0.6 | ||
| 18:2 n-6 | 3.5c | 0.2 | 12.6b | 0.2 | 18.7a | 0.4 | |
| 20:4 n-6 | 0.8 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0.05 | |
| 4.9c | 0.2 | 14.3b | 0.2 | 22.4a | 0.5 | ||
| 18:3 n-3 | 1.0c | 0 | 3.8b | 0.1 | 11.3a | 0.3 | |
| 18:4 n-3 | 1.6b | 0.1 | 1.1b | 0.0 | 5.5a | 0.5 | |
| 20:5 n-3 | 8.3a | 0.2 | 4.2b | 0.1 | 1.0c | 0.1 | |
| 22:5 n-3 | 2.1a | 0.8 | 1.1b | 0.1 | 0.2c | 0.0 | |
| 22:6 n-3 | 14.5a | 0.4 | 9.4b | 0.2 | 2.2c | 0.2 | |
| 29.1a | 0.8 | 20.7b | 0.2 | 21.1b | 1.1 | ||
| 15.1 | 1.1 | 16.2 | 0.8 | 15.2 | 0.9 | ||
| 30.7a | 0.5 | 22.5b | 0.5 | 18.0c | 0.1 | ||
| 31.3c | 0.7 | 43.1a | 0.3 | 38.2b | 0.3 | ||
| 18:2 n-6 | 3.0c | 0.1 | 11.8b | 0.3 | 19.3a | 0.2 | |
| 20:4 n-6 | 0.7a | 0.0 | 0.4c | 0.0 | 0.5b | 0.0 | |
| 4.5c | 0.1 | 13.2b | 0.3 | 20.8a | 0.2 | ||
| 18:3 n-3 | 0.8c | 0.0 | 3.5b | 0.1 | 13.2a | 0.2 | |
| 18:4 n-3 | 1.5b | 0.0 | 0.8c | 0.0 | 4.0a | 0.0 | |
| 20:5 n-3 | 8.9a | 0.4 | 4.0b | 0.1 | 0.8c | 0.0 | |
| 22:5 n-3 | 2.5a | 0.2 | 1.3b | 0.0 | 0.2c | 0.0 | |
| 22:6 n-3 | 10.4a | 0.6 | 6.5b | 0.2 | 1.9c | 0.3 | |
| 25.8a | 1.2 | 17.2c | 0.3 | 20.8b | 0.3 | ||
M, marine FM-FO-based diet; C, commercial-like FM-FO & plant-based diet; V, experimental 100% plant-based diet; SAT, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; ns, not significant. Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD comparison test. Mean values that do not share a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05). Juveniles: n = 4; ongrowing fish: n = 3.
Amounts of EPA + DHA (g fish-1) at different developmental stages in response to the experimental diet.
| EPA + DHA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Diet-M | 0.20a | 0.01 | 8.9A | 1.12 |
| Diet-C | 0.08b | 0.004 | 5.4B | 0.37 |
| Diet-V | 0.01c | 0.002 | 0.9C | 0.07 |
EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; M, marine FM-FO-based diet; C, commercial-like FM-FO & plant-based diet; V, experimental 100% plant-based diet. Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD comparison test. Mean values that do not share a common letter are significantly different (p<0.001), with lower and upper case letters indicating differences between dietary groups within juveniles and ongrowing fish, respectively. Juveniles: n = 4; ongrowing fish: n = 3.
Fig 4a-b. Intestinal (a) and hepatic (b) transcriptome: proportions of different GO-categories represented by differentially expressed genes obtained by a one-way ANOVA (factor: diet, FDR 0.05).
Impact of dietary treatments on the intestinal transcriptome of juveniles related to the expression of genes involved in GO biological processes.
| Fold Change (FC) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probe Name | Gene Symbol | Description | ||||
| CTSH | cathepsin H | - 5.1 | - 2.6 | + 2.0 | ||
| CTSL2 | cathepsin L2 | - 11.1 | - 4.0 | + 2.8 | ||
| DPP7 | dipeptidyl-peptidase 7 | - 2.2 | - 2.1 | + 1.0 | ||
| FOLH1 | folate hydrolase | - 3.9 | - 1.8 | + 2.2 | ||
| LGMN | Legumain | - 9.0 | - 4.5 | + 2.0 | ||
| ENPEP | glutamyl aminopeptidase (aminopeptidase A) | - 13.8 | - 1.9 | + 7.2 | ||
| MAN2B1 | mannosidase, alpha, class 2B, member 1 | - 7.1 | - 5.4 | + 1.3 | ||
| FUCA1 | fucosidase, alpha-L- 1, tissue | - 4.4 | - 2.8 | + 1.5 | ||
| FUCA2 | fucosidase, alpha-L- 2, plasma | - 8.3 | - 3.8 | + 2.2 | ||
| GLB1 | galactosidase, beta 1 | - 11.4 | - 3.5 | + 3.3 | ||
| NAGA | N-acetyl galactosaminidase, alpha | - 11.2 | - 3.8 | + 3.0 | ||
| NEU1 | neuraminidase 1 | - 25.8 | - 7.2 | + 3.6 | ||
| MPO | Myeloperoxidase | -1.5 | - 4.9 | - 3.3 | ||
| BAD | BCL2-associated agonist of cell death | - 2.3 | - 1.3 | + 1.8 | ||
| MAP3K7 | mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 | - 1.1 | - 1.5 | + 1.6 | ||
| CPT1A | carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (liver) | +1.4 | +1.0 | -1.4 | ||
| PQBP1 | polyglutamine binding protein 1 | +1.3 | -1.1 | -1.4 | ||
| MXD4 | max dimerization protein 4 | -1.7 | -1.6 | +1.1 | ||
| POLR2F | polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide F | 1.4 | -1.1 | -1.5 | ||
| PRPSAP2 | phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase-associated protein 2 | +1.4 | -1.0 | -1.4 | ||
| TTC4 | tetratricopeptide repeat domain 4 | +1.8 | +1.5 | -1.2 | ||
| RENBP | renin binding protein | -4.4 | -2.5 | +1.8 | ||
| ASAH1 | N-acylsphingosine amidohydrolase 1 | -2.6 | -1.9 | +1.4 | ||
| ASH2L | ash2 (absent, small, or homeotic)-like | -2.2 | -1.7 | +1.3 | ||
Genes tested by RT-q PCR are in bold.
Impact of dietary treatments on the hepatic transcriptome of juveniles related to the expression of genes involved in GO biological processes.
| Fold Change (FC) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probe name | Gene Symbol | Description | ||||
| CUST_9914_PI425536763 | TM7SF2 | transmembrane 7 superfamily member 2 | + 2.6 | + 5.7 | + 1.8 | |
| CUST_21841_PI425536763 | ATP5B | ATP synthase, H+ transporting mitochondrial F1 complex, beta subunit | - 1.0 | + 1.5 | + 1.5 | |
| CUST_20841_PI425536763 | ATP5C1 | ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, gamma polypeptide 1 | +1.1 | + 1.4 | + 1.3 | |
| TC114386 | UQCRC1 | ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase core protein I | -1.0 | + 1.7 | + 1.7 | |
Genes tested by RT-q PCR are in bold.
Fig 5Intestinal gene expression in juveniles and ongrowing fish (RT-qPCR).
Data are mean ± S.D. (n = 6 individuals/treatment). Differences between diets were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Values that do not share a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05), with lower and upper case letters indicating differences between dietary groups within juveniles and ongrowing fish, respectively.
Fig 6Hepatic gene expression in juveniles and ongrowing fish (RT-qPCR).
Data are mean ± S.D. (n = 6 individuals/treatment). Differences between diets were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Values that do not share a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05), with lower and upper case letters indicating differences between dietary groups within juveniles and ongrowing fish, respectively.