| Literature DB >> 30830467 |
Simon Roques1,2,3, Catherine Deborde4,5, Nadège Richard6, Luce Sergent7, Francis Kurz8, Sandrine Skiba-Cassy9, Benoît Fauconneau9, Annick Moing4,5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fish feed formulations are constantly evolving to improve the quality of diets for farmed fish and to ensure the sustainability of the aquaculture sector. Nowadays, insect, microalgae and yeast are feedstuff candidates for new feeds. However, the characterization of aquafeed is still based on proximate and targeted analyses which may not be sufficient to assess feed quality.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture; Feed; Insect; Metabolomics; Microalgae; Yeast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30830467 PMCID: PMC6267160 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-018-1454-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Feed formulation (g/100 g feed) of control feeds (COM, PB) and experimental feeds (INS, SPI, YST)
| Ingredients | COM | PB | INS | SPI | YST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish meal | 21.04 | ||||
| Fish oil | 4.88 | ||||
| Rich DHA algae meal | 6.84 | 6.84 | 6.84 | 6.84 | |
| Insect meal | 15.00 | ||||
| Sprirulin biomass | 15.00 | ||||
| Yeast protein fraction | 15.00 | ||||
| Processed animal proteinsa | 15.00 | ||||
| Vegetable oilsb | 14.65 | 18.1 | 14.95 | 18.15 | 17.2 |
| Plant proteinsc | 42.41 | 70.40 | 58.79 | 55.30 | 56.15 |
| Rapeseed lecithin | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 1.20 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.30 | |
| Phytase | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Lysine 78% | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.84 | 0.50 |
|
| 0.44 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.70 |
| Threonine 98% | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Vitamin C monophosphate 35 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Mineral premix | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Liquid choline | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Antioxidant | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Antifungal | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
All feedstuffs are displayed in g/100 g of feed
aProcessed animal proteins: blood meal, hydrolyzed feather meal, poultry meal
bVegetable oils: rapeseed oil and linseed oil
cPlant proteins: wheat gluten, hydrolyzed wheat gluten, pea protein, fababean protein concentrate, soy concentrate, soybean meal, rapeseed meal, peeled fababean and wheat. Amongst the plant proteins, soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peeled fababean were only used in COM feed. A fraction of wheat gluten, pea protein, soy concentrate and wheat and rapeseed oil and linseed oil were substituted by alternative feedstuffs in experimental feeds
Trout body weight for the five feeds after 84 days feeding
| COM | PB | INS | SPI | YST | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 49.10 ± 1.01 | 48.67 ± 1.35 | 48.90 ± 1.01 | 48.90 ± 1.01 | 49.33 ± 1.35 |
| Final body weight (g) | 279.10 ± 16.90 | 247.11 ± 13.99 | 303.33 ± 8.32* | 273.33 ± 27.84 | 284.44 ± 5.34* |
| Feed conversion ratio | 0.82 ± 0.02* | 0.98 ± 0.03† | 0.86 ± 0.02*† | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.88 ± 0.02*† |
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) associated with the five feeds. COM commercial, PB plant-based, INS insect, SPI spirulina, YST yeast. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 tanks)
*Significant difference compared to PB feed according to Student’s t test (P < 0.05)
†Significant difference compared to COM feed according to Student’s t test (P < 0.05)
Fig. 1PCA of 473 spectral bins measured in COM, PB, YST, INS and SPI trout feeds using 1H NMR profiling of polar extracts. PCA scores plot of first two principal components with four or five replicates per feed. COM, grey; PB, green; YST, yellow; INS, blue; SPI, red symbols
Fig. 2Volcano plot analysis of INS or SPI alternative feeds compared to PB feed for 473 spectral bins measured in feeds using 1H NMR profiling of polar extracts. Details with all variable names, annotations, ratios and P-values are presented in Online Resources 3 and 4. a Volcano plot analysis of PB and INS feeds with Wilcoxon’s test. Non-annotated dots correspond to metabolite features with adjusted P > 0.001 or 0.5 < INS/PB ratio < 2. All features with adjusted P < 0.001 and INS/PB ratio < 0.5 or > 2 are annotated. All identified compounds corresponding to these bins are annotated. b Volcano plot analysis of PB and SPI feeds with Wilcoxon’s test. Non-annotated dots correspond to metabolite features with adjusted P > 0.001 or 0.5 < SPI/PB ratio < 2. All features with adjusted P < 0.001 and SPI/PB ratio < 0.5 or > 2 are annotated. All identified compounds corresponding to these features are annotated. 3-Hbut 3-hydroxybutyrate, AMP adenosine mono-phosphate, ala alanine, carn carnitine, eth ethanolamine, glc glucose, glu glutamate, hypox hypoxanthine, ile isoleucine, lac lactate, leu leucine, orn ornithine, phe phenylalanine, pchol phosphocholine, pro proline, pyroglu pyroglutamate, succ succinate, tyr tyrosine, uri uridine, val valine
Fig. 3Superimposition of one representative 1H NMR CPMG spectrum of a polar extract for INS and one for PB feed. a Spectral region δ 0.75–5.5 ppm. b Spectral region δ 5.5–9.2 ppm. Annotated compounds correspond to variables highlighted in volcano plots with fold change > 2 and P-adj < 0.001. Spectrum of PB feed extract in green and that of INS in blue
Fig. 4Superimposition of one representative 1H NMR CPMG spectrum of a polar extract for SPI and one for PB feed. a Spectral region δ 0.75–5.5 ppm. b spectral region δ 5.5–9.2 ppm. Annotated compounds correspond to variables highlighted in volcano plots with fold change > 2 and P-adj < 0.001. Spectrum of PB feed extract in green and that of SPI in red