| Literature DB >> 33066515 |
David Sánchez Peñaranda1, Christine Bäuerl2, Ana Tomás-Vidal1, Miguel Jover-Cerdá1, Guillem Estruch1, Gaspar Pérez Martínez2, Silvia Martínez Llorens1.
Abstract
The interaction between diet and intestinal health has been widely discussed, although in vivo approaches have reported limitations. The intestine explant culture system developed provides an advantage since it reduces the number of experimental fish and increases the time of incubation compared to similar methods, becoming a valuable tool in the study of the interactions between pathogenic bacteria, rearing conditions, or dietary components and fish gut immune response. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of the total substitution of fish meal by plants on the immune intestinal status of seabream using an ex vivo bacterial challenge. For this aim, two growth stages of fish were assayed (12 g): phase I (90 days), up to 68 g, and phase II (305 days), up to 250 g. Additionally, in phase II, the effects of long term and short term exposure (15 days) to a plant protein (PP) diet were determined. PP diet altered the mucosal immune homeostasis, the younger fish being more sensitive, and the intestine from fish fed short-term plant diets showed a higher immune response than with long-term feeding. Vibrio alginolyticus (V. alginolyticus) triggered the highest immune and inflammatory response, while COX-2 expression was significantly induced by Photobacterium damselae subsp. Piscicida (P. damselae subsp. Piscicida), showing a positive high correlation between the pro-inflammatory genes encoding interleukin 1β (IL1-β), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and cyclooxygenase 2(COX-2).Entities:
Keywords: RT-qPCR; ex vivo; gilthead seabream; inflammation; intestine explants culture; plant protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33066515 PMCID: PMC7588912 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The intestinal basal expression of fish exposed to plant protein (PP) diet in Phase I (68 g). Relative gene expression (A.U.) of the different genes is expressed by the mean and standard error. Asterisks on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Sample data in each experimental group are represented by red spots. Fish Meal (FM) diet. Interleukin 1β: IL-1β; Interleukin 6:I L-6; Cyclooxygenase 2: COX-2; Immunoglobulin M: IgM; Occludin: Ocl.
Figure 2The effect of diet and intestinal section after 6 h of ex vivo bacterial exposition in Phase I (68 g). Relative gene expression (A.U.) of the different genes is expressed by the mean and standard error. Asterisks on the bars indicate significant differences between different conditions (diet/section) for each gene (p < 0.05) at 6 h of incubation. (A) Effect of dietary treatment (B) Effect of intestinal section. Sample data in each experimental group are represented by red spots. Foregut (FG); Hindgut (HD).
Figure 3The effect of bacterial challenge based on the diet after 6 h of ex vivo bacterial exposition in Phase I (68 g). Relative gene expression (A.U.) of the different genes is expressed by the mean and standard error. Capital letters indicate differences between diets, meanwhile lowercase letters or asterisks indicate differences between bacteria for each gene (p < 0.05) after 6 h of incubation. (A) The effect of bacterial challenge independent of diet. Gene expression of (B) IL-1β, (C) IL-6, (D) COX-2, (E) IgM, and (F) Ocl based on the stimuli and diet. Sample data in each experimental group are represented by red spots. Photobacterium damselae subsp. Piscicida (P. damselae subsp. Piscicida); Pseudomonas anguilliseptica (P. anguilliseptica); Vibrio alginolyticus (V. alginolyticus)
Figure 4Intestinal basal gene expression of fish exposed to long (PP) or short term (PP*) diet in Phase II (250 g). The relative gene expression (A.U.) of the different genes is expressed by the mean and standard error. An asterisk on the bars indicates significant differences (p < 0.05). Sample data in each experimental group are represented by red spots.
Effect of different factors on normalized gene expression values in Phase II.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet | 0.533 | 0.601 | 0.025 * | 0.120 | 0.044 * |
| Section | 0.157 | 0.138 | 0.168 | 0.864 | 0.486 |
| Stimuli | 0.003 * | 0.036 * | 0.021 * | 0.218 | 0.163 |
p-values obtained for each factor in the multifactorial analysis. Significant values are indicated by *. Interleukin 1β: IL-1β; Interleukin 6:I L-6; Cyclooxygenase 2: COX-2; Immunoglobulin M: IgM; Occludin: Ocl.
Figure 5The effect of bacterial challenge based on diet after ex vivo bacterial exposition in Phase II (250 g). Relative gene expression (A.U.) of the different genes is expressed by the mean and standard error. Capital letters indicate differences between diets, meanwhile lowercase letters indicate differences between bacteria for each gene (p < 0.05) after 6 h of incubation. (A) The effect of bacterial challenge independent of diet. Gene expression of (B) IL-1β, (C) IL-6, (D) COX-2, (E) IgM, and (F) Ocl based on the stimuli and diet. Sample data in each experimental group are represented by red spots.
Figure 6Correlation analysis of gene expression determined in samples after the ex vivo assay. Pearson product-moment coefficients between each pair of genes. Significant correlations are indicated with an *.
Ingredients (g kg−1 as fed) and proximate composition (% dry weight) of the experimental diets *.
| Diet | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (g kg−1) | FM | PP |
| Fish meal | 589 | |
| Wheat meal | 260 | |
| Wheat gluten | 295 | |
| Broad bean meal | 41 | |
| Soybean meal | 182 | |
| Pea meal | 41 | |
| Sunflower meal | 158 | |
| Krill meal | ||
| Squid meal | ||
| Fish oil | 38.1 | 90 |
| Soybean oil | 92.9 | 90 |
| Soy Lecithin | 10 | 10 |
| Vitamin-mineral mix 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Calcium phosphate | 38 | |
| Arginine | 5 | |
| Lysine | 10 | |
| Methionine | 7 | |
| Taurine | 20 | |
| Threonine | 3 | |
| Proximate composition (% dry weight) | ||
| Dry matter | 88.1 | 93.9 |
| Ashes | 10.1 | 7.4 |
| Crude lipid | 18.5 | 19.8 |
| Crude fiber | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| Crude protein | 44.2 | 45.0 |
| Essential amino acids (g 100 g-1) | ||
| Arginine | 3.39 | 3.30 |
| Histidine | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| Isoleucine | 1.47 | 1.17 |
| Leucine | 3.24 | 2.98 |
| Lysine | 3.68 | 2.26 |
| Methionine | 1.16 | 1.06 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.80 | 1.87 |
| Threonine | 1.98 | 1.44 |
| Valine | 2.01 | 1.47 |
* Fish meal (FM) diet: Diet formulated with fish meal as protein source; Plant protein (PP) diet: Diet in which fish meal was totally substituted with plant protein mixture. 1 Vitamins and mineral mixture (values are g kg−1): Premix, 25; Hill, 10; DL-a- tocopherol, 5; ascorbic acid, 5; (PO4)2Ca3, 5. Premix composition (values are IU kg−1): Retinol acetate, 1,000,000; calciferol, 500; DL-a-tocopherol, 10; menadione sodium bisulfite, 0.8; hydrochlorhydrate thiamine, 2.3; riboflavin, 2.3; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 15; cyanocobalamin, 25; nicotinamide, 15; pantothenic acid, 6; folic acid, 0.65; biotin, 0.07; ascorbic acid, 75; inositol, 15; betaine, 100; polypeptides, 12.
Figure 7Summary of the experimental design. The impact of dietary fish protein substitution by plant protein in fish immune response to the ex vivo bacterial challenge was evaluated at two on-growing phases: 12–68 g (90 days) and up to 250 g (305 days). Additionally, a group was included at 305 days to estimate the effect of short-term fish meal substitution (15 days; PP*).
Primer sequences of candidate genes (reference and target genes) in the RT-qPCR assay.
| Gene 1 | GeneBank ID | Primer Forward (5′→3′) | Primer Reverse (5′→3′) | Length (pb) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REFERENCE GENES | |||||
|
| AF184170 | CTGTCAAGGAAATCCGTCGT | TGACCTGAGCGTTGAAGTTG | 87 | [ |
|
| DQ641630 | CCAACGTGTCAGTGGTTGAC | AGCCTTGACGACCTTCTTGA | 80 | [ |
|
| AM490061 | AGGGTGTTGGCAGACGTTAC | CGCTCAACCTCCTCATCAGT | 97 | [ |
|
| X89920 | TCTGTCTGGATCGGAGGCTC | AAGCATTTGCGGTGGACG | 113 | [ |
| TARGET GENES | |||||
|
| AJ277166 | GCGACCTACCTGCCACCTACACC | TCGTCCACCGCCTCCAGATGC | 131 | [ |
|
| AM749958 | AGGCAGGAGTTTGAAGCTGA | ATGCTGAAGTTGGTGGAAGG | 101 | [ |
|
| AM296029 | GAGTACTGGAAGCCGAGCAC | GATATCACTGCCGCCTGAGT | 192 | [ |
|
| JQ811851 | TCAGCGTCCTTCAGTGTTTATGATGCC | CAGCGTCGTCGTCAACAAGCCAAGC | 131 | [ |
|
| JK692876 | GTGCGCTCAGTACCAGCAG | TGAGGCTCCACCACACAGTA | 81 | [ |
1 Elongation Factor 1α: EF-1α; Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase: GAPDH; Ribosomal Protein S18: Rps18; β-Actin: β-Act; Interleukin 1β: IL-1β; Interleukin 6:I L-6; Cyclooxygenase 2: COX-2; Immunoglobulin M: IgM; Occludin: Ocl.