Literature DB >> 35031678

Where is genetic medicine headed? Exploring the perspectives of Canadian genetic professionals on future trends using the Delphi method.

Kennedy Borle1, Nicola Kopac1, Nick Dragojlovic1, Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian1, Jan M Friedman2,3, Alison M Elliott2,3,4, Larry D Lynd5,6.   

Abstract

Driven by technological and scientific advances, the landscape of genetic medicine is rapidly changing, which complicates strategic planning and decision-making in this area. To address this uncertainty, we sought to understand genetic professionals' opinions about the future of clinical genetic and genomic services in Canada. We used the Delphi method to survey Canadian genetic professionals about their perspectives on whether scenarios about changes in service delivery and the use of genomic testing would be broadly implemented in their jurisdiction by 2030. We conducted two survey rounds; the response rates were 32% (27/84) and 67% (18/27), respectively. The most likely scenario was the universal use of noninvasive prenatal screening. The least likely scenarios involved population-based genome-wide sequencing for unaffected individuals. Overall, the scenarios perceived as most likely were those that have existing evidence about their benefit and potential medical necessity, whereas scenarios were seen as unlikely if they involved emerging technologies. Participants expected that the need for genetic healthcare services would increase by 2030 owing to changes in clinical guidelines and increased use of genome-wide sequencing. This study highlights the uncertainty in the future of genetic and genomic service provision and contributes evidence that could be used to inform strategic planning in clinical genetics.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35031678      PMCID: PMC9090755          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-01017-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   5.351


  28 in total

1.  Universal Multigene Panel Testing in all Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Steven Sorscher
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries: A scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Nicola Kopac; Kennedy Borle; Rachel Tandun; Shahrzad Salmasi; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Can breast surgeons provide breast cancer genetic testing? An American Society of Breast Surgeons survey.

Authors:  Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling.

Authors:  Heather A Zierhut; Ian M MacFarlane; Zahra Ahmed; Jill Davies
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models in the United States: Assessment of changes in use from 2010 to 2017.

Authors:  Samantha E Greenberg; Emily Boothe; Christine L Delaney; Ryan Noss; Stephanie A Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Reconciling Opportunistic and Population Screening in Clinical Genomics.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Jason L Vassy; Robert C Green
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Patient assessment of chatbots for the scalable delivery of genetic counseling.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Marci Schwartz; Kristy DiLoreto; H Lester Kirchner; Amy C Sturm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.

Authors:  Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Leslie G Biesecker; Valentina Di Francesco; Carla L Easter; Elise A Feingold; Adam L Felsenfeld; David J Kaufman; Elaine A Ostrander; William J Pavan; Adam M Phillippy; Anastasia L Wise; Jyoti Gupta Dayal; Britny J Kish; Allison Mandich; Christopher R Wellington; Kris A Wetterstrand; Sarah A Bates; Darryl Leja; Susan Vasquez; William A Gahl; Bettie J Graham; Daniel L Kastner; Paul Liu; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Benjamin D Solomon; Vence L Bonham; Lawrence C Brody; Carolyn M Hutter; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test.

Authors:  Anath C Lionel; Gregory Costain; Nasim Monfared; Susan Walker; Miriam S Reuter; S Mohsen Hosseini; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Daniele Merico; Rebekah Jobling; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Giovanna Pellecchia; Wilson W L Sung; Zhuozhi Wang; Peter Bikangaga; Cyrus Boelman; Melissa T Carter; Dawn Cordeiro; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Sharon D Dell; Priya Dhir; James J Dowling; Elise Heon; Stacy Hewson; Linda Hiraki; Michal Inbar-Feigenberg; Regan Klatt; Jonathan Kronick; Ronald M Laxer; Christoph Licht; Heather MacDonald; Saadet Mercimek-Andrews; Roberto Mendoza-Londono; Tino Piscione; Rayfel Schneider; Andreas Schulze; Earl Silverman; Komudi Siriwardena; O Carter Snead; Neal Sondheimer; Joanne Sutherland; Ajoy Vincent; Jonathan D Wasserman; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman; Chris Carew; Michael J Szego; Robin Z Hayeems; Raveen Basran; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Peter N Ray; Sarah Bowdin; M Stephen Meyn; Ronald D Cohn; Stephen W Scherer; Christian R Marshall
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.