Giuseppe Sessa1, Gianluca Testa2, Salvatore Gioitta Iachino1, Luciano Costarella1, Calogero Puma Pagliarello1, Margherita Ferrante3, Alfina Grasso3, Vito Pavone1. 1. Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. 2. Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. gianpavel@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies 'G.F. Ingrassia', University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Beginning in 2008, metal-on-metal prostheses have been in the spotlight owing to much higher revision rates than expected. Adverse local tissue reactions have been well described in the literature as potential complications. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2013, 13 patients with metal-on-metal total hip replacements were evaluated clinically and radiologically and with laboratory samples. The same tests were repeated between 2015 and 2016 on eight patients to assess any changes. In the laboratory assessment, we searched for chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, and nickel in blood and urine samples over 24 h. RESULTS: Clinical assessment has shown good score in all patients except one. On a second examination, between 2015 and 2016, all patients obtained results similar to those obtained in the first assessment, except a patient, who reported a recent fall. In the radiological assessment between 2012 and 2013, results were optimal, apart from a case of aseptic mobilization. The patients reassessed 3 years after the first examination showed radiological results similar to those previously obtained, apart from a patient, who showed signals of mobilization. Metal levels found in their blood decreased in most cases after 3 years. Urine levels of nickel increased in five subjects, and chromium levels increased in four, but levels of cobalt and molybdenum decreased in four patients. CONCLUSION: It could be hypothesized that the decreasing trend of metal ion levels is associated with a stable wear status. On the contrary, a progressive increase in metal ion levels must be considered as early proof of implant loosening.
BACKGROUND: Beginning in 2008, metal-on-metal prostheses have been in the spotlight owing to much higher revision rates than expected. Adverse local tissue reactions have been well described in the literature as potential complications. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2013, 13 patients with metal-on-metal total hip replacements were evaluated clinically and radiologically and with laboratory samples. The same tests were repeated between 2015 and 2016 on eight patients to assess any changes. In the laboratory assessment, we searched for chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, and nickel in blood and urine samples over 24 h. RESULTS: Clinical assessment has shown good score in all patients except one. On a second examination, between 2015 and 2016, all patients obtained results similar to those obtained in the first assessment, except a patient, who reported a recent fall. In the radiological assessment between 2012 and 2013, results were optimal, apart from a case of aseptic mobilization. The patients reassessed 3 years after the first examination showed radiological results similar to those previously obtained, apart from a patient, who showed signals of mobilization. Metal levels found in their blood decreased in most cases after 3 years. Urine levels of nickel increased in five subjects, and chromium levels increased in four, but levels of cobalt and molybdenum decreased in four patients. CONCLUSION: It could be hypothesized that the decreasing trend of metal ion levels is associated with a stable wear status. On the contrary, a progressive increase in metal ion levels must be considered as early proof of implant loosening.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chromium; Cobalt; Hip arthroplasty; Laboratory samples; Metal–metal coupling; Molybdenum
Authors: C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E Ebramzadeh; E S Szuszczewicz; D Salib; C Kim; H C Amstutz Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: K L Pei; D W Kinniburgh; L Butlin; P Faris; D Lee; D A Marshall; M C Oliver; R Parker; J N Powell; P Railton; J Smith Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Young-Min Kwon; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Dimitris Dimitriou; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Andrew A Freiberg; Harry E Rubash Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 4.757