Literature DB >> 27094245

What Is the Natural History of "Asymptomatic" Pseudotumours in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty? Minimum 4-Year Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging Longitudinal Study.

Young-Min Kwon1, Ming Han Lincoln Liow1, Dimitris Dimitriou1, Tsung-Yuan Tsai1, Andrew A Freiberg1, Harry E Rubash1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MARS-MRI) is an important cross-sectional imaging modality in detection of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty (HA) pseudotumours. Potential evolution of pseudotumours detected by MARS-MRI in "asymptomatic" patients with MoMHA arthroplasty beyond 2 years remains largely unknown. The aims of this longitudinal study were to (1) determine the natural history of pseudotumours in "asymptomatic" MoMHA patients under MARS-MRI surveillance and (2) characterize MRI feature(s) associated with progressive pseudotumours.
METHODS: A total of 37 MoMHA (32 patients, mean 56 years old) with pseudotumours on MARS-MRI were evaluated longitudinally using a standardized MARS-MRI protocol. Serum cobalt and chromium levels, pseudotumour size, thickness of the cyst wall, and MRI signal intensity of the abnormality were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: At minimum of 4-year follow-up (range 49-54 months), 4 Type II pseudotumours (11%) demonstrated MRI evidence of progression. Five Type I pseudotumours (14%) were found to have "regressed." No measurable MRI progression was detected in remaining patients (75%). MRI features associated with progressive pseudotumours included the presence of increased cystic wall thickness and "atypical" mixed fluid signal. MRI pseudotumour progression was not associated with metal ion levels.
CONCLUSION: The natural history of type I cystic pseudotumours continues to be nonprogressive in most "asymptomatic" MoMHA patients at minimum 4 years, suggesting the importance of patient symptoms and MRI characteristic features in the clinical decision-making process. Routine follow-up MARS-MRI evaluation of "asymptomatic" patients with low-grade cystic pseudotumours in the absence of interval clinical changes may not be indicated.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MARS MRI; hip arthroplasty; longitudinal study; metal-on-metal; “asymptomatic” pseudotumour

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27094245     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Potential presence of metals in patients treated with metal-metal coupling prostheses for hip arthroplasty at 7 and 10 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Salvatore Gioitta Iachino; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Margherita Ferrante; Alfina Grasso; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-22

3.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Madeleine A Gao; John P Neri; Yu-Fen Chiu; Bin Q Lin; Alissa J Burge; Edwin Su; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Antti Eskelinen; Andrew Judge; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging features for the differential diagnosis of local recurrence of bone sarcoma after prosthesis replacement.

Authors:  Le Qin; Qiyuan Bao; Jie Chen; Lianjun Du; Fuhua Yan; Yong Lu; Caixia Fu; Weibin Zhang; Yuhui Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Haemorrhagic Pseudotumour Following Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Joshua L Filer; James Berstock; Ynyr Hughes-Roberts; Julian Foote; Harvey Sandhu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-09

7.  Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Madeleine A Gao; John P Neri; Yu-Fen Chiu; Bin Q Lin; Alissa J Burge; Edwin Su; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Natural Remission of Major Periprosthetic Osteolysis following Total Hip Arthroplasty with Metal-on-Metal Bearings.

Authors:  Tatsuya Tamaki; Kazuhiro Oinuma
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2017-10-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.