Literature DB >> 29356874

In vitro feasibility of next generation non-linear beamforming ultrasound methods to characterize and size kidney stones.

Jaime E Tierney1, Siegfried G Schlunk1, Rebecca Jones1, Mark George1, Pranav Karve2, Ravindra Duddu2, Brett C Byram1, Ryan S Hsi3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging for kidney stones suffers from poorer sensitivity, diminished specificity, and overestimation of stone size compared to computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate in vitro feasibility of novel ultrasound imaging methods comparing traditional B-mode to advanced beamforming techniques including plane wave synthetic focusing (PWSF), short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) imaging, mid-lag spatial coherence (MLSC) imaging with incoherent compounding, and aperture domain model image reconstruction (ADMIRE). The ultrasound techniques were evaluated using a research-based ultrasound system applied to an in vitro kidney stone model at 4 and 8 cm depths. Stone diameter sizing and stone contrast were compared among the different techniques. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among group means, with p < 0.05 considered significant, and a Student's t test was used to compare each method with B-mode, with p < 0.0025 considered significant. All stones were detectable with each method. MLSC performed best with stone sizing and stone contrast compared to B-mode. On average, B-mode sizing error ± SD was > 1 mm (1.2 ± 1.1 mm), while those for PWSF, ADMIRE, and MLSC were < 1 mm (- 0.3 ± 2.9 mm, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.8 ± 0.8, respectively). Subjectively, MLSC appeared to suppress the entire background thus highlighting only the stone. The ADMIRE and SLSC techniques appeared to highlight the stone shadow relative to the background. The detection and sizing of stones in vitro are feasible with advanced beamforming methods with ultrasound. Future work will include imaging stones at greater depths and evaluating the performance of these methods in human stone formers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney; Kidney calculi; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29356874      PMCID: PMC6054908          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1036-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  27 in total

1.  Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography.

Authors:  Gabriel Montaldo; Mickaël Tanter; Jérémy Bercoff; Nicolas Benech; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  A Andrew Ray; Daniela Ghiculete; Kenneth T Pace; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Ultrasonic multipath and beamforming clutter reduction: a chirp model approach.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Marko Jakovljevic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Ultrasonography Significantly Overestimates Stone Size When Compared to Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Kevan M Sternberg; Brian Eisner; Troy Larson; Natalia Hernandez; Jullet Han; Vernon M Pais
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Prospective evaluation of Doppler sonography to detect the twinkling artifact versus unenhanced computed tomography for identifying urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Ania Z Kielar; Wael Shabana; Maryam Vakili; Jonathan Rubin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A Prospective Comparative Study of Color Doppler Ultrasound with Twinkling and Noncontrast Computerized Tomography for the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdel-Gawad; Ravi D Kadasne; Emad Elsobky; Bedeir Ali-El-Dein; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers.

Authors:  Michael N Ferrandino; Aditya Bagrodia; Sean A Pierre; Charles D Scales; Edward Rampersaud; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Measurement of Posterior Acoustic Stone Shadow on Ultrasound Is a Learnable Skill for Inexperienced Users to Improve Accuracy of Stone Sizing.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Barbrina Dunmire; Ziyue Liu; Kevan M Sternberg; Michael R Bailey; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Combining ADMIRE and MV to Improve Image Quality.

Authors:  Siegfried Schlunk; Brett Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Spatial Coherence in Medical Ultrasound: A Review.

Authors:  James Long; Gregg Trahey; Nick Bottenus
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Feasibility of non-linear beamforming ultrasound methods to characterize and size kidney stones.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Siegfried G Schlunk; Jaime E Tierney; Kazuyuki Dei; Rebecca Jones; Mark George; Pranav Karve; Ravindra Duddu; Brett C Byram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.