Margaret S Pearle1, Elizabeth A Calhoun, Gary C Curhan. 1. Department of Urology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110, USA. margaret.pearle@utsouthwestern.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. RESULTS: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.
PURPOSE: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. RESULTS: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.
Authors: Ralph C Wang; Robert M Rodriguez; Jahan Fahimi; M Kennedy Hall; Stephen Shiboski; Tom Chi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2016-12-11 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: F Pedro J Daels; Andrius Gaizauskas; Jorge Rioja; Anil K Varshney; Erkan Erkan; Yasar Ozgok; Michael Melekos; Jean J M C H de la Rosette Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Michael Soueidan; Susan J Bartlett; Yasser A Noureldin; Ross E Andersen; Sero Andonian Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Rustin Massoudi; Thomas J Metzner; Buzz Bonneau; Tin C Ngo; Rajesh Shinghal; John T Leppert Journal: J Endourol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Shrikant R Mulay; Onkar P Kulkarni; Khader V Rupanagudi; Adriana Migliorini; Murthy N Darisipudi; Akosua Vilaysane; Daniel Muruve; Yan Shi; Fay Munro; Helen Liapis; Hans-Joachim Anders Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 14.808