| Literature DB >> 29351737 |
Jean P Elbers1, Mary B Brown2, Sabrina S Taylor3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infectious disease is the single greatest threat to taxa such as amphibians (chytrid fungus), bats (white nose syndrome), Tasmanian devils (devil facial tumor disease), and black-footed ferrets (canine distemper virus, plague). Although understanding the genetic basis to disease susceptibility is important for the long-term persistence of these groups, most research has been limited to major-histocompatibility and Toll-like receptor genes. To better understand the genetic basis of infectious disease susceptibility in a species of conservation concern, we sequenced all known/predicted immune response genes (i.e., the immunomes) in 16 Florida gopher tortoises, Gopherus polyphemus. All tortoises produced antibodies against Mycoplasma agassizii (an etiologic agent of infectious upper respiratory tract disease; URTD) and, at the time of sampling, either had (n = 10) or lacked (n = 6) clinical signs.Entities:
Keywords: Genome-wide association study; Gopherus polyphemus; Immunogenetics; Immunomes; Next-generation sequencing; Sequence capture; Target enrichment
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29351737 PMCID: PMC5775545 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4452-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Description of Gopherus polyphemus samples by clinical status and diploid genotypes at several bases along the gene LOC101950941 on NCBI contig NW_007281632.1
| Sample | Clinical status | NW_007281632.1 Bases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53,575 | 53,576 | 53,577 | 53,578 | 53,579 | ||
| FC19 | Non-clin | A,A | A,A | T,T | A,A | AG,AG |
| OLD77 | Non-clin | A,A | A,A | T,T | A,G | AG,AG |
| CF53 | Non-clin | A,A | A,A | T,T | A,A | AG,AG |
| CF69 | Non-clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| FC58 | Non-clin | A,A | A,AT | G,T | A,G | A,AG |
| OLD106 | Non-clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| CF72 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,T | A,A | A,A |
| CF80 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| CF90 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| CF219 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| FC13 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| FC15 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| FC47 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| OLD65 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| OLD92 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
| OLD107 | Clin | A,A | AT,AT | G,G | A,A | A,A |
Non-clin for tortoises that were never observed with nasal discharge during the duration of the field study and Clin for tortoises that had at least one incident of mild to severe nasal discharge
CF Cecil Field, FC Fort Cooper, and OLD Oldenburg
Fig. 1Location of Florida study populations. CF for Cecil Field/Branan Field Wildlife and Environmental Area, FC for Fort Cooper State Park, and OLD for Perry Oldenburg Wildlife and Environmental Area
Estimates of genetic diversity for each tortoise population
| Site | AR | HO | HE |
|---|---|---|---|
| CF | 1.75a | 0.32a | 0.29a |
| FC | 1.78c | 0.33b | 0.30b |
| OLD | 1.77b | 0.34b | 0.30b |
AR allelic richness, HO and HE for observed and expected heterozygosity, respectively, CF Cecil Field, FC Fort Cooper, and OLD Oldenburg
Superscript letters for each column indicate differences at the 0.05 level using a post-hoc Tukey test. Shared letters within a column indicate no difference while unique letters indicate differences in levels
Fig. 2Principle component analysis for 16,821 all polymorphic SNPs. Circles indicate optimum clusters identified using STRUCTURE and STRUCTURE HARVESTER
Fig. 3STRUCTURE plots using (a) populations and (b) clinical status with optimum number of clusters K = 2 determined by STRUCTURE HARVESTER. CF for Cecil Field/Branan Field Wildlife and Environmental Area, FC for Fort Cooper State Park, and OLD for Perry Oldenburg Wildlife and Environmental Area. Non-clinical tortoises were never observed with nasal discharge during the duration of the field study. Clinical tortoises had at least one incident of mild to severe nasal discharge
Fig. 4Functional enrichment analysis of gopher tortoise genes deviating from neutrality (i.e., Test) compared to the rest of the genome (i.e., Reference) based on percent of sequences with particular gene ontology terms
Top SNPs and indels from PLINK GWAS association analysis between affected (clinical) and unaffected (non-clinical) tortoises
| Position | Gene | Type | Unadjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNPsa | |||
| NC_024232.1:1,105,959 | A. superbus venom factor 1-like | non-syn | 0.0001388 |
| NC_024232.1:1,105,940 | A. superbus venom factor 1-like | syn | 0.0001388 |
| NC_024232.1:1,105,284 | A. superbus venom factor 1-like | syn | 0.0001388 |
| NW_007281632.1:53,578 | Uncharacterized LOC101950941 | non-syn | 0.0001725 |
| NW_007281632.1:53,577 | Uncharacterized LOC101950941 | non-syn | 0.0001725 |
| Indelsb | |||
| NW_007281632.1:53,576 | Uncharacterized LOC101950941 | syn | 0.0001725 |
| NW_007281632.1:53,579 | Uncharacterized LOC101950941 | non-syn | 0.0001725 |
| NC_024234.1:2,112,869 | TNFRSF5-likec | syn | 0.0007433 |
Syn synonymous and non-syn non-synonymous
aAll of these SNPs had a false discovery rate of 0.4164 after correction for multiple tests
bAll of these indels had a false discovery rate of 0.2193 after correction for multiple tests
cTumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 5-like