| Literature DB >> 29348903 |
Teruo Inamoto1, Hideyasu Matsuyama2, Shigeru Sakano2, Naokazu Ibuki1, Kiyoshi Takahara1, Kazumasa Komura1, Tomoaki Takai1, Takuya Tsujino1, Yuki Yoshikawa1, Koichiro Minami1, Kazuhiro Nagao2, Ryo Inoue2, Haruhito Azuma1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION ANDEntities:
Keywords: Glasgow Prognostic Score; prognosis; upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Year: 2017 PMID: 29348903 PMCID: PMC5762588 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Baseline clinico-pathological characteristics
| Number | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 395 | 68.8% | |
| Female | 179 | 31.2% | |
| Age (mean, median, min-max) | 71, 72, 32–93 | ||
| ECOG PS | 0 | 452 | 78.7% |
| 1 | 102 | 17.8% | |
| 2 | 15 | 2.6% | |
| 3 | 5 | 0.9% | |
| Tumor focality | Unifocal | 467 | 81.4% |
| Multifocal | 107 | 18.6% | |
| pT classification | pT0/pTis/pTa | 0 | 0.0% |
| pT1 | 170 | 29.6% | |
| pT2 | 161 | 28.0% | |
| pT3 | 230 | 40.1% | |
| pT4 | 13 | 2.3% | |
| Grade | 1 | 38 | 6.6% |
| 2 | 269 | 46.9% | |
| 3 | 267 | 46.5% | |
| LVI | No | 385 | 67.1% |
| Yes | 189 | 32.9% | |
PS, performance status.
GPS related UTUC: clinico-pathological characteristics
| GPS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | ||||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |||
| Gender | Male | 232 | 69.9% | 95 | 72.0% | 68 | 61.8% | 0.19 |
| Female | 100 | 30.1% | 37 | 28.0% | 42 | 38.2% | ||
| Age (mean, median, min-max) | 70, 72, 41–92 | 72, 72, 46–93 | 72, 72, 32–93 | |||||
| ECOG PS | 0 | 269 | 81.0% | 101 | 76.5% | 82 | 74.5% | 0.20 |
| 1 | 51 | 15.4% | 28 | 21.2% | 23 | 20.9% | ||
| 2 | 11 | 3.3% | 1 | 0.8% | 3 | 2.7% | ||
| 3 | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 1.5% | 2 | 1.8% | ||
| Tumor focality | Unifocal | 276 | 83.1% | 104 | 78.8% | 87 | 79.1% | 0.44 |
| Multifocal | 56 | 16.9% | 28 | 21.2% | 23 | 20.9% | ||
| pT classification | pT1 | 136 | 41.0% | 24 | 18.2% | 10 | 9.1% | < 0.01 |
| pT2 | 88 | 26.5% | 71 | 53.8% | 2 | 1.8% | ||
| pT3 | 104 | 31.3% | 34 | 25.8% | 92 | 83.6% | ||
| pT4 | 4 | 1.2% | 3 | 2.3% | 6 | 5.5% | ||
| Grade | 1 | 26 | 7.8% | 8 | 6.1% | 4 | 3.6% | < 0.01 |
| 2 | 169 | 50.9% | 66 | 50.0% | 34 | 30.9% | ||
| 3 | 137 | 41.3% | 58 | 43.9% | 72 | 65.5% | ||
| LVI | No | 243 | 73.2% | 95 | 72.0% | 47 | 42.7% | < 0.01 |
| Yes | 89 | 26.8% | 37 | 28.0% | 63 | 57.3% | ||
GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score; UTUC, upper tract urothelial carcinoma; PS, performance status; LVI, lymphovascular invasion
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier survival curves stratified by Glasgow prognostic score (GPS)
The 10-year cancer-specific survival in patients with GPS0, GPS1, and GPS2 are indicated.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival curves stratified by glasgow prognostic score (GPS)
The 10-year overall survival in patients with GPS0, GPS1, and GPS2 are indicated.
Cox regression analysis for 10-year OS
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Gender | 0.56 | 1.10 | 0.80 | 1.52 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 1.40 |
| Age | < 0.01 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 0.17 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.04 |
| ECOG PS | 0.07 | 1.26 | 0.98 | 1.62 | 0.60 | 1.09 | 0.78 | 1.53 |
| Grade | < 0.01 | 1.92 | 1.46 | 2.53 | 0.01 | 1.68 | 1.14 | 2.47 |
| LVI | < 0.01 | 3.54 | 2.60 | 4.81 | < 0.01 | 2.90 | 1.86 | 4.54 |
| pT classification | < 0.01 | 1.94 | 1.60 | 2.34 | < 0.01 | 1.73 | 1.29 | 2.31 |
| Tumor focality | < 0.01 | 1.70 | 1.20 | 2.41 | 0.12 | 1.40 | 0.92 | 2.14 |
| GPS | < 0.01 | 1.57 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 0.53 | 1.07 | 0.86 | 1.34 |
OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; PS, performance status; LVI, lymphovascular invasion ; GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score.
Cox multivariate regression analysis for 10-year OS
| OR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Gender | 0.422 | 1.171 | 0.797 | 1.722 |
| Age | 0.107 | 1.017 | 0.996 | 1.038 |
| ECOG PS | 0.901 | 1.022 | 0.721 | 1.449 |
| Tumor focality | 0.058 | 1.504 | 0.986 | 2.294 |
| Glasgow Prognostic Score | < 0.01 | 1.539 | 1.241 | 1.908 |
OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; PS, performance status.
Model accuracy for 10-year CSS and OS
| CSS | OS | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-index | SE | 95% CI | C-index | SE | 95% CI | |||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Age | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| Grade | 0.66 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.65 |
| LVI | 0.70 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.69 |
| pT classification | 0.70 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.69 |
| Tumor focality | 0.54 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| GPS | 0.58 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.03 | < 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.65 |
CSS, cancer specific survival; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; LVI, lymphovascular invasion ; GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score