Literature DB >> 18095885

Bladder cancer following upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Eric C Kauffman1, Jay D Raman.   

Abstract

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon relative to primary bladder transitional cell carcinoma, with notable differences at the genetic, molecular and clinical levels. A variety of management options with similar oncologic outcomes are available for UTUC. Regardless of upper tract treatment modality, recurrence in the bladder consistently occurs in 20-50% of patients, thus presenting a significant clinical challenge. The initial intravesical relapse typically occurs within the first 2 years following upper tract therapy, but the risk is lifelong and repeat episodes are common. The identification of variables that allow accurate risk stratification of UTUC patients with regards to future bladder relapse is crucial. Unfortunately, to date, no variables have been identified that can reliably predict such bladder recurrences. A history of bladder cancer prior to UTUC resection and upper tract tumor multifocality are frequently reported clinical risk factors. Candidate molecular markers, such as E-cadherin, also hold promise for improving patient risk stratification. The impact of bladder recurrences on patient survival is still poorly defined. The risk of progression to invasive bladder disease is not well documented but appears to be an infrequent event. This article highlights important recent observations and key current issues regarding UTUC and subsequent bladder cancer. In addition, we suggest a bladder surveillance regimen following UTUC and provide recommendations for managing patients with intravesical recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18095885     DOI: 10.1586/14737140.8.1.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  5 in total

1.  Predictive value of gene methylation for second recurrence following surgical treatment of first bladder recurrence of a primary upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bao Guan; Yunchao Xing; Gengyan Xiong; Zhenpeng Cao; Dong Fang; Yifan Li; Yonghao Zhan; Ding Peng; Libo Liu; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Comparison of the clonality of urothelial carcinoma developing in the upper urinary tract and those developing in the bladder.

Authors:  Yuding Wang; Michael R Lang; Christopher L Pin; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-08-28

3.  Ureteral involvement and diabetes increase the risk of subsequent bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Che-Yuan Hu; Yu-Chieh Tsai; Shuo-Meng Wang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Huai-Ching Tai; Chung-Hsin Chen; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Wei-Chou Lin; Kuo-How Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Are urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract a distinct entity from urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder? Behavior of urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery with respect to anatomical location: a case control study.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score as a powerful prognostic factor in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Shigeru Sakano; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Kazumasa Komura; Tomoaki Takai; Takuya Tsujino; Yuki Yoshikawa; Koichiro Minami; Kazuhiro Nagao; Ryo Inoue; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.