Literature DB >> 22551892

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) predicts toxicity and efficacy in platinum-based treated patients with metastatic lung cancer.

Ioannis Gioulbasanis1, Athanasios Pallis, Panagiotis J Vlachostergios, Alexandros Xyrafas, Zoe Giannousi, Isidora-Eleni Perdikouri, Michalitsa Makridou, Dionysia Kakalou, Vassilios Georgoulias.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. A cumulative prognostic score based on C-reactive protein and albumin, termed the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), indicates the presence of systemic inflammatory response. GPS has been proposed as a powerful prognostic tool for patients with various types of malignant tumors, including lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of baseline GPS in terms of toxicity and response in lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients referred to our institution for consideration of first-line platinum-based treatment were eligible. Demographics and disease-related characteristics were recorded. Toxicity was graded according to NCI CTCAE version 3.0 throughout first-line therapy. GPS was calculated before the onset of treatment and was related to the development of toxicity. Response to first-line therapy and survival data were also collected.
RESULTS: Totally, 96 lung cancer patients were accrued. GPS was associated with increased mucositis p=0.004), neurotoxicity (p=0.038), neutropenia (p=0.02), dose reductions or/ and need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (p=0.005), toxicity-related termination of treatment (p=0.001) and chemotherapy-related toxic deaths (p=0.013). GPS was associated with overall survival (p=0.016) and progression-free survival (p=0.016) as well as response to treatment (p=0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that GPS assessment is predictive of the most important aspects of platinum-related toxicity and this may partly explain its associations with poor clinical outcome in patients with metastatic lung cancer.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22551892     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with operable and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heng Fan; Zhen-Yi Shao; Yuan-Yuan Xiao; Zhi-Hui Xie; Wen Chen; Hua Xie; Guo-You Qin; Nai-Qing Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Validation of Pretreatment Prognostic Factors and Prognostic Staging Systems for Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Real-World Data Set.

Authors:  Raphael Hagmann; Alfred Zippelius; Sacha I Rothschild
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Results of platinum-based chemotherapy in unselected performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Jouveshomme; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score for glioblastoma multiforme patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide.

Authors:  Erkan Topkan; Ugur Selek; Yurday Ozdemir; Berna A Yildirim; Ozan C Guler; Fuat Ciner; Huseyin Mertsoylu; Kadir Tufan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor survival in cisplatin-based treated patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Cui Chen; Peng Sun; Qiang-sheng Dai; Hui-wen Weng; He-ping Li; Sheng Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Glasgow prognostic score predicts prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Sumei Chen; Shenglin Ma; Shirong Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-12

Review 7.  C-Reactive Protein Is an Important Biomarker for Prognosis Tumor Recurrence and Treatment Response in Adult Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shiva Shrotriya; Declan Walsh; Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Shirley Thomas; Cliona Lorton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of baseline serum C-reactive protein and C-reactive protein kinetics on the prognosis of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei-Xiong Xia; Yan-Fang Ye; Xing Lu; Lin Wang; Liang-Ru Ke; Hai-Bo Zhang; Mark D Roycik; Jing Yang; Jun-Li Shi; Ka-Jia Cao; Xiang Guo; Yan-Qun Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Montreal prognostic score: estimating survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using clinical biomarkers.

Authors:  B Gagnon; J S Agulnik; I Gioulbasanis; G Kasymjanova; D Morris; N MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Glasgow prognostic score in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in stages IIIb and IV.

Authors:  Sefika Umihanic; Sekib Umihanic; Sead Jamakosmanovic; Selmira Brkic; Munevera Osmic; Suvad Dedic; Nusret Ramic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.