Literature DB >> 25034097

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Shinsuke Takeno1, Tatsuya Hashimoto, Ryosuke Shibata, Kenji Maki, Hironari Shiwaku, Ippei Yamana, Risako Yamashita, Yuichi Yamashita.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the superiority of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) before surgery in patients with gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The participants of this retrospective study comprised 552 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at the Fukuoka University Hospital. The HS-mGPS was calculated before surgery based on cutoff values of 0.3 mg/dl for C-reactive protein and 3.5 g/dl for albumin, and correlations between the HS-mGPS and the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis were evaluated. In addition, the superiority of the HS-mGPS to the mGPS as a prognostic indicator was examined in detail.
RESULTS: The mGPS was 0 in 494 patients, 1 in 24 patients and 2 in 34 patients. In contrast, the HS-mGPS was 0 in 411 patients, 1 in 75 patients and 2 in 66 patients. Both the mGPS (p < 0.0001) and HS-mGPS (p < 0.0001) were good prognostic predictors in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy. Of the 494 patients with an mGPS of 0 before surgery, 51 and 32 exhibited an HS-mGPS of 1 and 2, respectively. The patients who exhibited migration in the HS-mGPS demonstrated a significantly more unfavorable prognosis than the patients with an HS-mGPS of 0 (p < 0.0001). The prognostic impact of the HS-mGPS was especially clear in stage I and IV patients (p = 0.0027, p = 0.017). The HS-mGPS was found to be a superior prognostic predictor compared to the mGPS in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: The HS-mGPS before surgery is a superior prognostic predictor in patients with gastric cancer.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034097     DOI: 10.1159/000362601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  19 in total

1.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score is Better for Predicting Oncological Outcome in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Compared to High-Sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score.

Authors:  Tomoki Nakamura; Kunihiro Asanuma; Tomohito Hagi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-07-11

3.  Pre-treatment Glasgow prognostic score and modified Glasgow prognostic score may be potential prognostic biomarkers in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Yunqiu Xu; Yuxiao Zheng; Xiao Li; Yang Gao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

4.  Preoperative C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts Prognosis of Patients after Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xuechao Liu; Xiaowei Sun; Jianjun Liu; Pengfei Kong; Shangxiang Chen; Youqing Zhan; Dazhi Xu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Association between pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score and gastric cancer survival and clinicopathological features: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Xiao Zhang; Shu-Yi Wang; Shuang-Qian Chen; Shuai-Long Yang; Lu Wan; Bin Xiong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A Preoperative Clinical Risk Score Including C-Reactive Protein Predicts Histological Tumor Characteristics and Patient Survival after Surgery for Sporadic Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An International Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Florian Primavesi; Valentina Andreasi; Frederik J H Hoogwater; Stefano Partelli; Dominik Wiese; Charlotte Heidsma; Benno Cardini; Eckhard Klieser; Katharina Marsoner; Uwe Fröschl; Sabine Thalhammer; Ines Fischer; Georg Göbel; Andreas Hauer; Tobias Kiesslich; Philipp Ellmerer; Reinhold Klug; Daniel Neureiter; Helwig Wundsam; Franz Sellner; Peter Kornprat; Reinhold Függer; Dietmar Öfner; Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Detlef K Bartsch; Ruben H J de Kleine; Massimo Falconi; Stefan Stättner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  The preoperative sensitive-modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting long-term survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui Tian; Fei Zhang; Peng Sun; Jing Wu; Hong Yan; Ai-Ran Wu; Min Zhang; Yu-Lu Jiang; Yan-Hong Lu; Qiu-Yan Xu; Xiao-Hong Zhan; Rong-Xin Zhang; Li-Ting Qian; Jie He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

8.  The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ross D Dolan; Jason Lim; Stephen T McSorley; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  High-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) Is superior to the mGPS in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Min Fang; Qiuyan Wan; Xuebang Zhang; Tao Song; Shixiu Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-11

10.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score as a powerful prognostic factor in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Shigeru Sakano; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Kazumasa Komura; Tomoaki Takai; Takuya Tsujino; Yuki Yoshikawa; Koichiro Minami; Kazuhiro Nagao; Ryo Inoue; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.