STUDY TYPE: Prognosis (case series). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the delay from diagnosis of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), and the pathological features and outcomes, as the decision to proceed to RNU for an individual patient is complex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 187 patients who had RNU were reviewed; the interval from diagnosis to RNU was analysed as both a continuous (months) and categorical variable (<3 vs > or =3 months). Logistic regression and survival analyses were used to evaluate the association between time from diagnosis to RNU with pathological characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The median time from diagnosis to RNU was 45 days (interquartile range 68). A delay from diagnosis to RNU analysed as a continuous variable was associated with advanced stage, higher grade, previous endoscopic procedure, tumour necrosis, infiltrative tumour architecture, and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.034), but not disease recurrence or cancer-specific mortality. In the subgroup of patients (90, 48.1%) who had muscle-invasive disease (> or =pT2) a longer delay from diagnosis to RNU as a continuous variable was associated with advanced stage (P = 0.030), higher grade (P = 0.014), infiltrative tumour architecture (P = 0.044), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.034), disease recurrence (P = 0.02), and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a delay in the interval from diagnosis to RNU is associated with more advanced disease stage. These findings might have important implications for trial design in the ongoing evaluation of neoadjuvant regimens. Timely consideration of definitive treatment for patients with high-risk UTUC is of high importance. Further studies are necessary to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.
STUDY TYPE: Prognosis (case series). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the delay from diagnosis of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), and the pathological features and outcomes, as the decision to proceed to RNU for an individual patient is complex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 187 patients who had RNU were reviewed; the interval from diagnosis to RNU was analysed as both a continuous (months) and categorical variable (<3 vs > or =3 months). Logistic regression and survival analyses were used to evaluate the association between time from diagnosis to RNU with pathological characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The median time from diagnosis to RNU was 45 days (interquartile range 68). A delay from diagnosis to RNU analysed as a continuous variable was associated with advanced stage, higher grade, previous endoscopic procedure, tumour necrosis, infiltrative tumour architecture, and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.034), but not disease recurrence or cancer-specific mortality. In the subgroup of patients (90, 48.1%) who had muscle-invasive disease (> or =pT2) a longer delay from diagnosis to RNU as a continuous variable was associated with advanced stage (P = 0.030), higher grade (P = 0.014), infiltrative tumour architecture (P = 0.044), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.034), disease recurrence (P = 0.02), and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a delay in the interval from diagnosis to RNU is associated with more advanced disease stage. These findings might have important implications for trial design in the ongoing evaluation of neoadjuvant regimens. Timely consideration of definitive treatment for patients with high-risk UTUC is of high importance. Further studies are necessary to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.
Authors: Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat Journal: Urologe A Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Thomas F Chromecki; Behfar Ehdaie; Giacomo Novara; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Richard K Lee; Eugene K Cha; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Casey Ng; Jay D Raman; Felix K Chun; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas J Walton; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-04-17 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Atiqullah Aziz; Jakub Dobruch; Kees Hendricksen; Luis A Kluth; Andrea Necchi; Aidan Noon; Michael Rink; Florian Roghmann; Roland Seiler; Paolo Gontero; Wassim Kassouf; Shahrokh F Shariat; Evanguelos Xylinas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Vincent Bourgade; Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Jerôme Parra; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Laurent Nison; Morgan Rouprêt; Grégory Bozzini; Adil Ouzzane; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Alain Ruffion; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Sophie Hurel; Antoine Valeri; Mathieu Roumiguie; Thomas Polguer; Nicolas Hoarau; Olivier Mérigot de Treigny; Evanguelos Xylinas; Alexandre Matte; Stéphane Droupy; Pierre Olivier Fais; Aurélien Descazeaud; Pierre Colin Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 4.226