Literature DB >> 23240937

Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.

Tchaiko Parris1, Dorothy Wakefield, Heather Frimmer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to retrospectively evaluate the benefits of screening breast ultrasound in women with dense breast tissue following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458 in October 2009. This bill mandated that women be informed of their breast density and the possible benefit of ultrasound as an additional screening modality. Institutional approval was obtained from the institutional review board for this retrospective study. A total of 5519 women with dense breasts were screened with ultrasound in the year after the law went into effect from October 2009 to September 2010 (post law group). We focused on the women who had negative mammograms and biopsy recommendations based on ultrasound findings (BIRADS 4 and 5). The data were compared with those from a group of 1319 women who were screened with breast ultrasound before the law went into effect between October 2008 and September 2009 (pre law group). Prior to the law, ultrasound studies were performed only at the referring clinician's request. Of the 5,519 women in the post law group, 10 malignant lesions were found, with a cancer detection rate of 0.18%, biopsy rate of 3.3%, and a positive predictive value of 5.5%. The tumor size on ultrasound ranged from 4 to 15 mm; mean 9.7 mm. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative in 7 of 10 patients. Of the 1,319 women in the pre law group, 20 biopsies were recommended, all of which were benign. No malignancies were detected in the pre law group. Establishment of a formal screening breast ultrasound program as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts increased our cancer detection rate following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23240937     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  25 in total

Review 1.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meagan Brennan; Brooke Nickel; Shuangqin Huang; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Alexander Mundinger
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 4.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer; Priscilla J Slanetz; Jennifer S Haas; Nadine M Tung; Kevin S Hughes; Katrina Armstrong; A Alan Semine; Susan L Troyan; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.

Authors:  Stefanie Weigel; W Heindel; J Heidrich; H-W Hense; O Heidinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Visibility of mammographically occult breast cancer on diffusion-weighted MRI versus ultrasound.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Diana L Lam; Brett Weitzel; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 1.605

8.  The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Loren Saulsberry; Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Breast Density Notification Legislation and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Early Evidence from the SEER Registry.

Authors:  Ilana Richman; Steven M Asch; Eran Bendavid; Jay Bhattacharya; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Natasha K Stout; Clyde Schechter; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Mucahit Cevik; Oguzhan Alagoz; Christoph I Lee; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning; Karla Kerlikowske; Constance D Lehman; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.