Literature DB >> 25055284

Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.

Jessica M Ho1, Nasima Jafferjee, Gabriel M Covarrubias, Munir Ghesani, Bradley Handler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this article are to discuss the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) and what it means for patients, define breast density and explain how it is measured, review the new state-based legislation regarding the reporting of dense breast tissue directly to patients and the possibility of an adjunct screening examination, describe possible supplemental screening options and the advantages and disadvantages of each, and outline the current shortcomings and unanswered questions regarding new legislation.
CONCLUSION: Breast density is now established as an independent risk factor for developing breast cancer irrespective of other known risk factors. Women with breast density in the upper quartile have an associated four to five times greater risk of developing breast cancer relative to women with breast density in the lower quartile. Many states have enacted or proposed legislation requiring mammographers to report to patients directly if they have dense breast tissue and recommend discussing the possibility of a supplemental screening examination with their physicians. However, there is currently no consensus as to whether a supplemental screening examination should be pursued or which modality to use. Possible supplemental screening modalities include ultrasound, MRI, digital breast tomosynthesis, and molecular breast imaging. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved an automated breast ultrasound system for screening whole-breast ultrasound in patients with dense breasts. However, many questions are still unanswered including the impact on morbidity and mortality, cost-effectiveness, and insurance coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast density; legislation; screening; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25055284     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Association between breast cancer, breast density, and body adiposity evaluated by MRI.

Authors:  Wenlian Zhu; Peng Huang; Katarzyna J Macura; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Gold silver alloy nanoparticles (GSAN): an imaging probe for breast cancer screening with dual-energy mammography or computed tomography.

Authors:  Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Jessica C Hsu; Maryam Hajfathalian; Shaameen Mian; Peter Chhour; Lahari Uppuluri; Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew D A Maidment; David P Cormode
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.

Authors:  Khaled Alkhalifah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Breast Density.

Authors:  Jordonna Brown; Chloe Soukas; Jenny J Lin; Laurie Margolies; Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  An Investigation into the Consistency in Mammographic Density Identification by Radiologists: Effect of Radiologist Expertise and Mammographic Appearance.

Authors:  Yanpeng Li; Patrick C Brennan; Warwick Lee; Carolyn Nickson; Mariusz W Pietrzyk; Elaine A Ryan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Nancy R Kressin; Kristina Cooper; Cinthya Marturano; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.

Authors:  Katharina Holland; Carla H van Gils; Ritse M Mann; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Clinical Report on the First Prototype of a Photoacoustic Tomography System with Dual Illumination for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Elham Fakhrejahani; Masae Torii; Toshiyuki Kitai; Shotaro Kanao; Yasufumi Asao; Yohei Hashizume; Yoshiki Mikami; Iku Yamaga; Masako Kataoka; Tomoharu Sugie; Masahiro Takada; Hironori Haga; Kaori Togashi; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.