Literature DB >> 18037249

Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.

Susan A Sabatino1, Ellen P McCarthy, Russell S Phillips, Risa B Burns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We surveyed primary care providers to evaluate breast cancer risk assessment and management practices.
METHODS: Primary care providers included staff (attendees, fellows, nurse practitioners) and residents practicing >or=1 session/week in an outpatient general medicine practice or community practices. Of 201 eligible providers, 107 (53%) completed a self-administered questionnaire ascertaining attitudes, perceived barriers, and clinical practices related to assessing and managing breast cancer risk.
RESULTS: Of providers, 96% mostly or definitely agreed that assessing breast cancer risk was a primary care provider's responsibility. In assessing risk, most providers reported usually or always asking about family history (71%), but fewer usually or always ask about parity (48%), biopsies (40%), or menarche (35%), and most never calculate Gail scores (76%). In managing women at high risk for breast cancer, many providers reported usually or always communicating increased risk to patients (58%) and tailoring screening based on risk (53%); however fewer providers usually or always discuss chemoprevention (13%) or genetic testing (16%) or refer to specialists (35%). Addressing more immediate issues (25%) and lacking confidence in knowledge of risk and risk assessment (20%) were the most commonly reported barriers to assessing risk (n=83).
CONCLUSION: Primary care providers generally assess breast cancer risk primarily using family history, potentially missing women at increased risk based on other criteria. In addition, although providers tailor screening and refer women at high risk to specialists, they infrequently discuss chemoprevention or genetic testing. Addressing perceived barriers to assessing risk may improve care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037249     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  40 in total

1.  A multidisciplinary clinic for individualizing management of patients at increased risk for breast and gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Natalie J Engel; Patricia Gordon; Darcy L Thull; Beth Dudley; Judy Herstine; Rachel C Jankowitz; Kristin K Zorn
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Personalized Multi-Condition Risk Assessment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Heather J Baer; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Elissa V Klinger; Stella St Hubert; George Getty; Phyllis Brawarsky; E John Orav; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; David W Bates; Graham Colditz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography.

Authors:  Kenyon C Bolton; John L Mace; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Ted A James; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta M Geller; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The Complexity of Achieving the Promise of Precision Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; William E Barlow; Marilyn M Schapira; Charles D MacLean; Carrie N Klabunde; Brian L Sprague; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jane S Chen; Asaf Bitton; Tracy Onega; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

7.  Familial risk of cancer and knowledge and use of genetic testing.

Authors:  Heather J Baer; Phyllis Brawarsky; Michael F Murray; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Role of age and health in treatment recommendations for older adults with breast cancer: the perspective of oncologists and primary care providers.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; F Lennie Wong; Doojduen Villaluna; Smita Bhatia; Cathie T Chung; Joanne Mortimer; Sara Hurvitz; Arash Naeim
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.