Literature DB >> 27296462

Impact of Breast Density Legislation on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of 110 Radiology Facilities.

Lina Nayak1, Kanae K Miyake1, Jessica W T Leung2, Elissa R Price3, Yueyi I Liu1, Bonnie N Joe3, Edward A Sickles3, William R Thomas1, Jafi A Lipson1, Bruce L Daniel1, Jonathan Hargreaves4, R James Brenner5,6, Lawrence W Bassett7, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier6, Karen K Lindfors4, Stephen A Feig8, Debra M Ikeda1.   

Abstract

Breast density notification laws, passed in 19 states as of October 2014, mandate that patients be informed of their breast density. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of this legislation on radiology practices, including performance of breast cancer risk assessment and supplemental screening studies. A 20-question anonymous web-based survey was emailed to radiologists in the Society of Breast Imaging between August 2013 and March 2014. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. Around 121 radiologists from 110 facilities in 34 USA states and 1 Canadian site responded. About 50% (55/110) of facilities had breast density legislation, 36% of facilities (39/109) performed breast cancer risk assessment (one facility did not respond). Risk assessment was performed as a new task in response to density legislation in 40% (6/15) of facilities in states with notification laws. However, there was no significant difference in performing risk assessment between facilities in states with a law and those without (p < 0.831). In anticipation of breast density legislation, 33% (16/48), 6% (3/48), and 6% (3/48) of facilities in states with laws implemented handheld whole breast ultrasound (WBUS), automated WBUS, and tomosynthesis, respectively. The ratio of facilities offering handheld WBUS was significantly higher in states with a law than in states without (p < 0.001). In response to breast density legislation, more than 33% of facilities are offering supplemental screening with WBUS and tomosynthesis, and many are performing formal risk assessment for determining patient management.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer screening; breast density legislation; breast density notification laws

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27296462     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  8 in total

1.  Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.

Authors:  Laura Ward; S Heller; S Hudson; L Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Systematic review of women's knowledge, attitude, and practice towards breast cancer.

Authors:  Zahra Meshkani; Najmeh Moradi; Ali Aboutorabi; Sara Noman; Ali Ghanbari Motlagh; Mostafa Langarizadeh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Nancy R Kressin; Kristina Cooper; Cinthya Marturano; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial.

Authors:  Siobhan S Mahorter; Sarah Knerr; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Karen J Wernli; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Erin A Bowles; Sarah Knerr; Kathleen A Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-12

7.  Understanding the response of mammography facilities to breast density notification.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Mary W Marsh; Kathryn Earnhardt; Michael Pritchard; Thad S Benefield; Robert P Agans; Sheila S Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Availability Versus Utilization of Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Post Passage of Breast Density Legislation.

Authors:  Mary W Marsh; Thad S Benefield; Sheila Lee; Michael Pritchard; Katie Earnhardt; Robert Agans; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.681

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.