Literature DB >> 2933154

Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms.

J H Reiber, C J Kooijman, A den Boer, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

In the quantitative assessment of coronary arterial dimensions from coronary cineangiograms, the contrast catheter is usually used as a scaling device, requiring the definition of the catheter contours by semi- or fully automated contour detection procedures. The image quality of the x-ray radiated catheter is dependent on the catheter material, concentration of the contrast agent in the catheter, and kilovoltage of the x-ray source. The effects of these variables on the image quality and accuracy of the size-measurement of the filmed catheters were studied for four different catheter materials: woven dacron (wd), polyvinylchloride (pv), polyurethane (pu), and nylon. The following parameters were studied: measured size, image contrast, and average brightness gradient along the edges of the displayed catheters. The average differences of the angiographically measured size with the true size for the wd, pv, pu, and nylon catheters were +0.2, -3.2, -3.5, and +9.8%, respectively. The image contrast at various fillings of the catheters was roughly identical for the wd, pv, and pu catheters, and significantly lower for the nylon catheter. Image gradient was highest for the wd catheter, followed by the pv and pu catheters, and lowest for the nylon catheter. From these data it may be concluded that the woven dacron catheter is most suitable for quantitative coronary angiographic studies. The polyvinylchloride and polyurethane catheters perform about equally well but slightly less than the woven dacron catheter. The nylon catheter should not be used for such quantitative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2933154     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810110512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn        ISSN: 0098-6569


  9 in total

1.  Elimination of variable vasomotor tone in studies with repeated quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  S Jost; W Rafflenbeul; G H Reil; H J Trappe; D Gulba; H Hecker; U Gerhardt; I Knop
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1990

2.  Morphometry versus densitometry--a comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries.

Authors:  P A Doriot; C Suilen; N Guggenheim; P A Dorsaz; F Chappuis; W Rutishauser
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

3.  Advantages and limitations of two software calipers in quantitative coronary arteriography.

Authors:  G Koning; J H Reiber; C D von Land; G Loois; B van Meurs
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1991

4.  The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries.

Authors:  P A Doriot; P A Dorsaz; L Dorsaz; P Chatelain; W Rutishauser
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-12

5.  The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  W Wunderlich; B Roehrig; F Fischer; H R Arntz; R Agrawal; A Morguet; H P Schultheiss; D Horstkotte
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-08

6.  Correlations between quantitative cineangiography, coronary flow reserve measured with digital subtraction cineangiography and exercise thallium perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; P Fioretti; J H Reiber; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1988

7.  Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt Softouch coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine arteriograms.

Authors:  G Koning; P M van der Zwet; C D von Land; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

8.  Percutaneous coronary rotational angioplasty: preliminary clinical and quantitative imaging results.

Authors:  G J Laarman; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1991

9.  Angioplasty for stable versus unstable angina pectoris: are unstable patients more likely to get restenosis? A quantitative angiographic study in 339 consecutive patients.

Authors:  H E Luijten; K J Beatt; P J de Feyter; M van den Brand; J H Reiber; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1988
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.