Literature DB >> 29325590

Dynamic changes in 18F-borono-L-phenylalanine uptake in unresectable, advanced, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and malignant melanoma during boron neutron capture therapy patient selection.

Takahiro Morita1,2, Hiroaki Kurihara3, Kenta Hiroi3, Natsuki Honda3, Hiroshi Igaki4, Jun Hatazawa5, Yasuaki Arai3, Jun Itami4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated dynamic changes in 18F-borono-L-phenylalanine (18F-BPA) uptake in unresectable, advanced, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC) and malignant melanoma (MM) during boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) patient selection.
METHODS: Dynamic changes in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR), and tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR) for 18F-BPA were evaluated in 20 patients with SCC and 8 patients with MM.
RESULTS: SUVmax in SCC tumors decreased significantly from 30 to 120 min. There was a non-statistically significant decrease in SUVmax for SCC tumors from 30 to 60 min and from 60 to 120 min. Patients with MM had nonsignificant SUVmax changes in 18F-BPA uptake on delayed imaging. Nonsignificant 18F-BPA TNR and TBR changes were seen in patients with SCC and MM.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic changes in SUVmax for 18F-BPA uptake had a washout pattern in SCC and a persistent pattern in MM. Dynamic 18F-BPA -PET studies should be performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of 18F-BPA in humans and select appropriate candidates who may benefit from BNCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boron neutron capture therapy; Dynamic 18F–BPA-PET study; Malignant melanoma; Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29325590      PMCID: PMC5765671          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0949-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


Background

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been used for various types of intractable cancers, including glioblastoma, head and neck tumors, and melanoma [1-6]. This type of radiation therapy is based on nuclear reactions between neutrons and boron-10 (10B). After a targeted tumor contains a considerable concentration of 10B, the region to be treated is exposed to thermal neutrons. The nuclear reactions between these neutrons and 10B produce alpha particles and 7Li in a very short range (<10 μm) that should kill the cell. The success of BNCT depends on sufficient accumulation of 10B in tumor cells relative to adjacent tissues [5, 6]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess 10B concentration in tumor tissue before BNCT is performed [7]. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18Fborono-L-phenylalanine (18FBPA) has been used to screen for appropriate candidates who can benefit from BNCT [2, 3, 8–11]. Before BNCT, the 10B concentration in tumor tissue is estimated by measuring the tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) and the tumor-to-blood pool ratio (TBR) with 18FBPA PET imaging [2, 3, 12, 13]. Hanaoka et al. demonstrated a significant positive correlation between levels of BPA and 18FBPA accumulation in an animal model [14]. 10B accumulation is not consistent across patients; it is reported to also depend on tumor type [15, 16]. Thus, knowledge of the dynamic changes in 10B accumulation by tumor type is critical for performing BNCT. However, there is still limited information in the literature regarding dynamic changes in 18FBPA uptake in various tumor types in humans. The purpose of this study was to examine the dynamic changes in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18FBPA in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC) and malignant melanoma (MM). TNR and TBR of 18FBPA in SCC and MM were also evaluated.

Methods

General

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board and independent ethics committee of our hospital. All patients provided written informed consent before inclusion in the trial.

Radiosynthesis of 18F–BPA

18FBPA was synthesized with direct electrophilic radiofluorination of BPA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) using 18F–acetyl hypofluorite as described previously [7, 17]. Purification of 18FBPA was performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a YMC-Pack ODS-A column (20 × 150 mm; YMC, Kyoto, Japan) eluted with 0.1% acetic acid at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. The radiochemical purity of 18FBPA as determined by HPLC was >99.5%. Its specific activity was 25 MBq/μmol.

Patients and PET/CT protocol

This study included 20 patients with SCC and 8 patients with MM who underwent 18FBPA PET/CT from March 2012 to August 2016. Patients had histologically confirmed malignant tumors and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. We defined adequate organ function for patients with unresectable cancer on the basis of the normal range observed by our hospital laboratory. Adequate organ function was determined by neutrophil count ≥1500 /μL, platelet count ≥75,000 /μL, hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL, serum bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL, aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 100 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 100 IU/L, serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction >60%. The main exclusion criteria were congestive heart failure, uncontrolled angina pectoris, arrhythmia, symptomatic infectious disease, severe bleeding, pulmonary fibrosis, obstructive bowel disease or severe diarrhea, and symptomatic pleural or pericardial effusion. This study was approved by the ethics committees of our institution. Dynamic changes in 18FBPA uptake were evaluated in 20 patients with SCC and 8 patients with MM. PET images were acquired using a Discovery 600 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). PET images were reconstructed as using a 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm. PET image evaluation and quantification of SUV were performed using AW Volume Share 4.5 software. SUV was defined as regional radioactivity divided by injected radioactivity normalized to body weight. PET/CT images were taken 30, 60, and 120 min after 18FBPA injection (4.0 MBq/kg of body weight). Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the reconstructed PET images. Tumor SUVmax in ROIs was defined as the area of highest activity. ROIs were also drawn around normal tissue surrounding the tumor to calculate the TNR for 18FBPA and the blood pool in order to calculate the TBR for 18FBPA. The retention index (RI) was defined as the difference in SUVmax between early and delayed 18FBPA PET imaging, expressed as a percentage of the initial uptake (RI = (SUVdelayed − SUVearly)/SUVearly × 100%). The difference in SUVmax and RI were calculated to evaluate the change in tracer levels in malignant lesions at 30, 60 and 120 min after 18FBPA injection. Quantitative values above zero were defined as increased SUVmax and values below zero were defined as decreased SUVmax.

Statistical analysis

SUVmax, TNR, and TBR were analyzed using paired one-way ANOVA. The paired t-test was used to determine the significance of differences in dynamic SUVmax values, TNR, and TBR. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. For statistical analysis, JMP software (version 11.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used.

Results

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. SUVmax, TNR, and TBR for 18FBPA in SCC and MM are summarized in Table 2. Only SUVmax showed significant differences between 30 and 120 min in patients with SCC.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Histology of the primary tumorNumberGenderAge, years
Male/FemaleMean ± SD (range)
Squamous cell carcinoma203/1757.6 ± 16.1 (16–81)
Malignant melanoma82/659.1 ± 13.7 (37–76)

Abbreviation: SD Standard deviation

Table 2

PET values for squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma

PET valueHistology18F–BPA at 30 min18F–BPA at 60 min18F–BPA at 120 min
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD
SUVmaxSquamous cell carcinoma5.58 ± 2.294.79 ± 1.953.83 ± 1.56
Malignant melanoma9.41 ± 5.448.30 ± 4.617.39 ± 4.40
TNRSquamous cell carcinoma3.21 ± 1.663.28 ± 1.632.79 ± 1.52
Malignant melanoma7.89 ± 6.507.69 ± 4.916.68 ± 4.24
TBRSquamous cell carcinoma3.97 ± 1.763.84 ± 1.673.37 ± 1.52
Malignant melanoma9.82 ± 7.658.43 ± 4.338.33 ± 4.13

Abbreviations: F–BPA 18F–borono-L-phenylalanine, PET Positron emission tomography, SD Standard deviation, SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value, TNR Tumor-to–normal tissue accumulation ratio, TBR Tumor-to-blood pool ratio

Patient characteristics Abbreviation: SD Standard deviation PET values for squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma Abbreviations: F–BPA 18Fborono-L-phenylalanine, PET Positron emission tomography, SD Standard deviation, SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value, TNR Tumor-to–normal tissue accumulation ratio, TBR Tumor-to-blood pool ratio Figure 1 is a box plot of SUVmax for tumors at 30, 60, and 120 min after injection. SUVmax in SCC tumors decreased significantly from 30 to 120 min, but the decrease was not statistically significant from 30 to 60 min and from 60 to 120 min. All 20 patients with SCC had gradual decreases in SUVmax from 30 to 120 min (Table 2). On the other hand. Nonsignificant 18FBPA differences on delayed imaging were seen in patients with MM (Fig. 1, Tables 2 and 3). In contrast to patients with SCC, not all patients with MM had decreases in SUVmax from 30 to 60 min, 60 to 120 min, and 30 to 120 min.
Fig. 1

Box plot of SUVmax for tumors at 30, 60, and 120 min after 18F–BPA injection

Table 3

Statistically significant differences in dynamic SUVmax changes in squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma

Squamous cell carcinomaMalignant melanoma
From 30 min to 60 min
P value0.10640.6504
Difference in SUVmaxaMean ± SD (Range)1.02 ± 0.61 (0.2–2.7)1.1 ± 1.7 (−1.4–2)
RIMean ± SD (Range)17.6 ± 7.3 (4.7–28.0)12.0 ± 15.5 (−17.1–29.9)
Number of patients with increase03
Number of patients with decrease205
From 60 min to 120 min
P value0.12630.7098
Difference in SUVmaxMean ± SD (Range)0.96 ± 0.56 (0.3–2.6)0.91 ± 0.74 (−0.2–2.3)
RIMean ± SD (Range)20 ± 6.6 (5.2–29.2)13.6 ± 10.9 (−0.02–32.4)
Number of patients with increase01
Number of patients with decrease207
From 30 min to 120 min
P value0.00230.412
Difference in SUVmaxMean ± SD (Range)1.98 ± 1.02 (0.6–4.7)2.03 ± 2.38 (−1.1–7)
RIMean ± SD (Range)34.0 ± 8.7 (8.7–46.7)22.4 ± 22.3 (−13.4–52.1)
Number of patients with increase02
Number of patients with decrease206

aDifference in SUVmax difference was calculated as delayed SUVmax minus earlier SUVmax

Abbreviations: RI Retention index, SD Standard deviation, SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value

Box plot of SUVmax for tumors at 30, 60, and 120 min after 18FBPA injection Statistically significant differences in dynamic SUVmax changes in squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma aDifference in SUVmax difference was calculated as delayed SUVmax minus earlier SUVmax Abbreviations: RI Retention index, SD Standard deviation, SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value Nonsignificant TNR and TBR for 18FBPA were seen on delayed imaging in both patient groups (Table 2). Representative 18FBPA PET images are shown in Figs. 2 and 3.
Fig. 2

Representative 18F–BPA PET images in a 50-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal. 18F–BPA PET images at (a) 30 min (SUVmax = 11.0, TNR = 5.0, TBR = 8.5), (b) 60 min (SUVmax = 8.9, TNR = 5.2, TBR = 6.9), and (c) 120 min (SUVmax = 6.3, TNR = 4.5, TBR = 5.3) after injection

Fig. 3

Representative 18F–BPA PET images of malignant melanoma in a 39-year-old woman with sphenoid sinus melanoma. 18F–BPA PET images at (a) 30 min (SUVmax = 8.2, TNR = 7.5, TBR = 5.9), (b) 60 min (SUVmax = 9.6, TNR = 9.6, TBR = 6.9), and (c) 120 min (SUVmax = 9.3, TNR = 9.3, TBR = 7.2) after injection

Representative 18FBPA PET images in a 50-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal. 18FBPA PET images at (a) 30 min (SUVmax = 11.0, TNR = 5.0, TBR = 8.5), (b) 60 min (SUVmax = 8.9, TNR = 5.2, TBR = 6.9), and (c) 120 min (SUVmax = 6.3, TNR = 4.5, TBR = 5.3) after injection Representative 18FBPA PET images of malignant melanoma in a 39-year-old woman with sphenoid sinus melanoma. 18FBPA PET images at (a) 30 min (SUVmax = 8.2, TNR = 7.5, TBR = 5.9), (b) 60 min (SUVmax = 9.6, TNR = 9.6, TBR = 6.9), and (c) 120 min (SUVmax = 9.3, TNR = 9.3, TBR = 7.2) after injection

Discussion

The aim of this study was to examine dynamic 18FBPA changes in SUVmax in SCC and MM as part of the patient selection process for BNCT. In SCC, dynamic changes in SUVmax for 18FBPA uptake had a washout pattern, compared with a persistent pattern of 18FBPA uptake in MM. 18FBPA was developed to predict 10B accumulation in tumors and normal tissues with PET [18]. Studies have shown that there are a variety of amino acid transporters, such as Systems L, A, ASC, and B [19, 20]. System L is the primary contributor to 18FBPA uptake, which is correlated with total L-amino acid transporter (LAT) expression, more specifically LAT1 and LAT4. Many tumors overexpress LAT1 or LAT4 [21-23]. Previous studies have shown that the expression of amino acid transporters in tumors varies widely, and it sometimes reflects proliferation speed and malignancy [24]. However, reasons for differences in dynamic changes in 18FBPA uptake between SCC and MM remain uncertain. It is unclear whether 18FBPA undergoes metabolic transformation, although metabolic transformation of L-phenylalanine has been reported [25]. LAT and the metabolic transformation of 18FBPA may contribute to dynamic changes in 18FBPA accumulation in tumors. Further studies with more participants and evaluation of processes involved in 18FBPA metabolic transformation are needed to resolve this question. In clinical BNCT, 18FBPA accumulation was measured about 1 h after 18FBPA administration [26-29]. However, the number of dynamic studies of 18FBPA uptake in humans is limited. Therefore, we focused on dynamic 18FBPA uptake in humans. Our study showed that SUVmax for 18FBPA uptake in SCC has a washout pattern. It is very important to realize that some tumor histological types may have a washout pattern. 18FBPA uptake in different tumor types may be vary with extended distribution time in 18FBPA PET imaging. Further dynamic 18FBPA -PET studies should be performed to determine who are appropriate candidates that can benefit from BNCT. In this study, we did not evaluate the pharmacokinetics of BPA or the BPA-fructose complex because we focused on dynamic accumulation of 18FBPA in human tumors. Hanaoka et al. showed a positive association between the levels of BPA and 18FBPA accumulation in a rat model [14]. However, the biodistribution of 18FBPA in animals and humans is different [30]. In addition, metabolic transformation of 18FBPA and BPA in vivo may also differ. Direct pharmacokinetic comparisons between 18FBPA and BPA levels in tumors are required during and at the end of BNCT in humans to define early and delayed 18FBPA imaging times. The present study had some limitations. Two different tumor types were examined in our study. Our 18FBPA findings for SCC were consistent with previous studies [28, 31]. However, the characteristics of dynamic 18FBPA accumulation in radioresistant head and neck carcinomas, such as mucoepidermoid carcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas, is unknown [3]. Various intractable cancers that can be treated with BNCT represent a wide spectrum of histopathological backgrounds. Further studies involving more patients, each representing a specific pathological entity, are therefore needed.

Conclusions

Dynamic changes in SUVmax for 18FBPA uptake in SCC has a washout pattern, while 18FBPA uptake in MM has a persistent pattern. Dynamic 18FBPA -PET studies should be performed as part of a human pharmacokinetic study of 18FBPA and to select appropriate candidates who may benefit from BNCT.
  31 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of 10B-p-boronophenylalanine in tumours, skin and blood of melanoma patients: a study of boron neutron capture therapy for malignant melanoma.

Authors:  H Fukuda; C Honda; N Wadabayashi; T Kobayashi; K Yoshino; J Hiratsuka; J Takahashi; T Akaizawa; Y Abe; M Ichihashi; Y Mishima
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Treatment of malignant melanoma by single thermal neutron capture therapy with melanoma-seeking 10B-compound.

Authors:  Y Mishima; C Honda; M Ichihashi; H Obara; J Hiratsuka; H Fukuda; H Karashima; T Kobayashi; K Kanda; K Yoshino
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Effectiveness of boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  Itsuro Kato; Yusei Fujita; Akira Maruhashi; Hiroaki Kumada; Masatoshi Ohmae; Mitsunori Kirihata; Yoshio Imahori; Minoru Suzuki; Yoshinori Sakrai; Tetsuro Sumi; Soichi Iwai; Mitsuhiro Nakazawa; Isao Murata; Hiroyuki Miyamaru; Koji Ono
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Synthesis and radiation dosimetry of 4-borono-2-[18F]fluoro-D,L-phenylalanine: a target compound for PET and boron neutron capture therapy.

Authors:  K Ishiwata; T Ido; A A Mejia; M Ichihashi; Y Mishima
Journal:  Int J Rad Appl Instrum A       Date:  1991

5.  Predominant contribution of L-type amino acid transporter to 4-borono-2-(18)F-fluoro-phenylalanine uptake in human glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Yoshimoto; Hiroaki Kurihara; Natsuki Honda; Keiichi Kawai; Kazuyo Ohe; Hirofumi Fujii; Jun Itami; Yasuaki Arai
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Biodistribution studies of boronophenylalanine-fructose in melanoma and brain tumor patients in Argentina.

Authors:  S J Liberman; A Dagrosa; R A Jiménez Rebagliati; M R Bonomi; B M Roth; L Turjanski; S I Castiglia; S J González; P R Menéndez; R Cabrini; M J Roberti; D A Batistoni
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  In vivo spatial correlation between (18)F-BPA and (18)F-FDG uptakes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kazuma Kobayashi; Hiroaki Kurihara; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Naoya Murakami; Koji Inaba; Satoshi Nakamura; Akihisa Wakita; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Rei Umezawa; Kana Takahashi; Hiroshi Igaki; Yoshinori Ito; Seiichi Yoshimoto; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Jun Itami
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  FBPA PET in boron neutron capture therapy for cancer: prediction of (10)B concentration in the tumor and normal tissue in a rat xenograft model.

Authors:  Kohei Hanaoka; Tadashi Watabe; Sadahiro Naka; Yasukazu Kanai; Hayato Ikeda; Genki Horitsugi; Hiroki Kato; Kayako Isohashi; Eku Shimosegawa; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  A case of radiation-induced osteosarcoma treated effectively by boron neutron capture therapy.

Authors:  Gen Futamura; Shinji Kawabata; Hiroyuki Siba; Toshihiko Kuroiwa; Minoru Suzuki; Natsuko Kondo; Koji Ono; Yoshinori Sakurai; Minoru Tanaka; Tomoki Todo; Shin-Ichi Miyatake
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Clinical significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression as a prognostic marker and potential of new targeting therapy in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Kyoichi Kaira; Yutaka Sunose; Yasuhiro Ohshima; Noriko S Ishioka; Kazuhisa Arakawa; Tetsushi Ogawa; Noriaki Sunaga; Kimihiro Shimizu; Hideyuki Tominaga; Noboru Oriuchi; Hideaki Itoh; Shushi Nagamori; Yoshikatsu Kanai; Aiko Yamaguchi; Atsuki Segawa; Munenori Ide; Masatomo Mori; Tetsunari Oyama; Izumi Takeyoshi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics of Boronophenylalanine and Its Uptakes in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Futian Tang; Yujie Wei; Shining Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Wenjiao Gu; Fenxia Tang; Xiaohuan Peng; Yucai Wei; Jiangyan Liu; Weiqiang Chen; Shixu Zhang; Long Gu; Yumin Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.