| Literature DB >> 25621196 |
Kohei Hanaoka1, Tadashi Watabe2, Sadahiro Naka3, Yasukazu Kanai2, Hayato Ikeda1, Genki Horitsugi1, Hiroki Kato4, Kayako Isohashi4, Eku Shimosegawa4, Jun Hatazawa5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a molecular radiation treatment based on the (10)B (n, α) (7)Li nuclear reaction in cancer cells, in which delivery of (10)B by 4-borono-phenylalanine conjugated with fructose (BPA-fr) to the cancer cells is of critical importance. The PET tracer 4-borono-2-(18) F-fluoro-phenylalanine (FBPA) has been used to predict the accumulation of BPA-fr before BNCT. However, because of the difference in chemical structure between BPA-fr and FBPA and the difference in the dose administered between BPA-fr (therapeutic dose) and FBPA (tracer dose), the predictive value of FBPA PET for BPA-fr accumulation in the tumor and normal tissues is not yet clearly proven. We conducted this study to validate FBPA PET as a useful test to predict the accumulation of BPA-fr in the tumor and normal tissues before BNCT.Entities:
Keywords: BPA-fr; Boron concentration; Boron nuclear capture therapy; FBPA
Year: 2014 PMID: 25621196 PMCID: PMC4293470 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-014-0070-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Absolute of boron concentration after injection of 40 mg (167.32 ± 18.65 mg/kg body weight) BPA by ICP-OES (ppm)
| Absolute of boron concentration (ppm) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Median | Mean ± SD | |
| Tumor | 24.31 | 27.56 ± 8.42 |
| Brain | 7.73 | 7.66 ± 1.15 |
| Lung | 17.76 | 15.12 ± 3.83 |
| Liver | 13.80 | 14.93 ± 2.49 |
| Spleen | 19.04 | 20.48 ± 4.59 |
| Pancreas | 50.66 | 52.25 ± 12.06 |
| Small intestine | 16.45 | 16.46 ± 2.49 |
| Large intestine | 12.97 | 13.21 ± 1.53 |
| Kidney | 77.64 | 83.06 ± 16.08 |
| Blood | 12.44 | 12.25 ± 0.96 |
Figure 1Time-activity curve. Based on average count of tumor and normal organs in F344 rats after administration of FBPA.
Figure 2Correlation between accumulation levels based on maximum count. Correlation between the accumulation level of BPA-fr measured by ICP-OES and that of FBPA estimated by FBPA PET/CT based on the maximum count in a rat model.
Figure 3Correlation between accumulation levels based on average count. Correlation between the accumulation level of BPA-fr measured by ICP-OES and that of FBPA estimated by FBPA PET/CT based on the average count in a rat model.
Figure 4PET/CT images of a RGC-6 glioma-bearing F344 rat. PET/CT fused images of F344 male rats with RGC-6 glioma xenografts 60 min after injection of approximately 30 MBq of FBPA. (a) At the level of brain, (b) at the level of heart and transplanted tumor, (c) at the level of pancreas and liver, (d) at the level of kidneys, and (e) at the level of bladder (all transaxial images). FBPA accumulation in the tumor was found in the plane (b) indicated by an arrow. In the planes (c), (d), and (e), high accumulations were found in the pancreas, kidneys, and bladder, respectively.
Biodistribution of BPA-fr and [F] FBPA in various organs of RGC6 glioma-bearing Fischer 344 rats ( = 7)
| Accumulation of BPA-fr by ICP-OES (%ID/g) | Accumulation of FBPA by PET based on maximum count (%ID/g) | Accumulation of FBPA by PET based on average count (%ID/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | |
| Tumor | 1.27 | 1.44 ± 0.44 | 1.34 | 1.36 ± 0.31 | 0.80 | 0.79 ± 0.18* |
| Brain | 0.40 | 0.40 ± 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.26 | 0.27 ± 0.07* |
| Lung | 0.93 | 0.79 ± 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.38 ± 0.05* | 0.23 | 0.25 ± 0.05* |
| Liver | 0.72 | 0.78 ± 0.13 | 0.78 | 0.78 ± 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.61 ± 0.12 |
| Spleen | 0.99 | 1.07 ± 0.24 | 0.89 | 0.88 ± 0.10 | 0.59 | 0.58 ± 0.08* |
| Pancreas | 2.65 | 2.73 ± 0.63 | 2.64 | 2.42 ± 0.63 | 1.76 | 1.63 ± 0.36* |
| Small intestine | 0.86 | 0.86 ± 0.13 | 0.48 | 0.52 ± 0.10* | 0.36 | 0.36 ± 0.08* |
| Large intestine | 0.68 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.44 | 0.46 ± 0.09* | 0.30 | 0.30 ± 0.07 |
| Kidney | 4.06 | 4.34 ± 0.84 | 5.52 | 5.70 ± 0.89* | 4.56 | 4.66 ± 0.76 |
| Blood | 0.65 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.59 | 0.61 ± 0.14 | 0.45 | 0.47 ± 0.10* |
*p < 0.05 compared to BPA-fr by ICP-OES.
Figure 5Representative light microscopy images of the glioma (hematoxylin-eosin staining). Area (a) has a lower cell density than area (b), indicating the heterogeneity of the tumor components.