| Literature DB >> 24131658 |
Kyoichi Kaira1, Yutaka Sunose, Yasuhiro Ohshima, Noriko S Ishioka, Kazuhisa Arakawa, Tetsushi Ogawa, Noriaki Sunaga, Kimihiro Shimizu, Hideyuki Tominaga, Noboru Oriuchi, Hideaki Itoh, Shushi Nagamori, Yoshikatsu Kanai, Aiko Yamaguchi, Atsuki Segawa, Munenori Ide, Masatomo Mori, Tetsunari Oyama, Izumi Takeyoshi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The expression of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) has been described to play essential roles in tumor cell growth and survival. However, it remains unclear about the clinicopathological significance of LAT1 expression in biliary tract cancer. This study was conducted to determine biological significance of LAT1 expression and investigate whether LAT1 could be a prognostic biomarker for biliary tract cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24131658 PMCID: PMC4016614 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient’s characteristics and pathological findings
| 71 | 71 | 74 | 64 | 62 | ||||||
| 86 | 61.8 | 65 | 73.0 | 8 | 26.7 | 13 | 65.0 | NA | ||
| 67 | 48.2 | 38 | 42.7 | 19 | 47.4 | 10 | 50.0 | NA | ||
| 33 | 23.7 | 18 | 20.2 | 3 | 10.0 | 12 | 60.0 | NA | ||
| 111 | 79.8 | 74 | 83.1 | 23 | 76.7 | 14 | 70.0 | NA | ||
| 93 | 66.9 | 66 | 74.1 | 16 | 53.3 | 12 | 60.0 | NA | ||
| 62 | 44.6 | 41 | 46.1 | 11 | 36.7 | 10 | 50.0 | NA | ||
| | | | | | ||||||
| | 40 | 28.7 | 23 | 25.8 | 12 | 40.0 | 5 | 25.0 | NA | |
| | 70 | 50.4 | 49 | 55.1 | 12 | 40.0 | 9 | 45.0 | ||
| | 16 | 11.5 | 8 | 9.0 | 5 | 16.7 | 3 | 15.0 | ||
| | 13 | 9.4 | 9 | 10.1 | 1 | 3.3 | 3 | 15.0 | ||
| 32 | 23.0 | 13 | 14.6 | 18 | 60.0 | 1 | 5.0 | NA | ||
| 51 | 36.7 | 34 | 38.2 | 8 | 26.7 | 9 | 45.0 | NA | ||
| 65 | 46.7 | 46 | 51.7 | 12 | 40.0 | 7 | 35.0 | NA | ||
| 66 | 47.5 | 44 | 49.4 | 12 | 40.0 | 10 | 50.0 | NA | ||
| 89 | 64.0 | 59 | 66.3 | 18 | 60.0 | 12 | 60.0 | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 62 | 44.6 | 43 | 48.3 | 13 | 43.3 | 6 | 30.0 | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 69 | 49.6 | 46 | 51.7 | 14 | 46.7 | 9 | 45.0 | 0 | 0.0% | |
| 71 | 51.1 | 44 | 49.4 | 20 | 66.7 | 7 | 35.0 | 0 | 0.0% | |
Abbreviation: EHCC Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, GB Gallbladder carcinoma, IHCC Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, UICC International union against cancer, p-stage Pathological stage, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen, LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, NA Not applicable.
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of tissue from a 79-years old man with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (A) and a 66-years old woman with Xanthogranulomatous chlecystitis as control group (B). Immunostaining of LAT1 demonstrates a membranous immunostaining pattern in cholangiocarcinoma, but there was no evidence of LAT1 staining in xanthogranulomatous chlecystitis.
Patient’s demographics according to LAT1 expression status
| Age | ≤65 / >65 | 24 / 65 | 11 / 39 | 0.549 | 17 / 42 | 4 / 26 | 0.121 | 3 / 15 | 2 / 10 | >0.999 | 5 / 7 | 5 / 3 | 0.649 |
| Gender | M / F | 55 / 34 | 31 / 19 | >0.999 | 43 / 16 | 22 / 8 | >0.999 | 4 / 14 | 4 / 8 | 0.677 | 8 / 4 | 5 / 3 | >0.999 |
| Tumor size(mm) | ≤35 / >35 | 48 / 41 | 28 / 22 | 0.862 | 34 / 25 | 22 / 8 | 0.170 | 11 / 7 | 10 / 2 | 0.248 | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 | 0.647 |
| Resection status | R0 / R1 | 42 / 47 | 25 / 25 | 0.859 | 25 / 34 | 13 / 17 | >0.999 | 12 / 6 | 8 / 4 | >0.999 | 5 / 7 | 5 / 3 | 0.649 |
| Pathological differentiation | WD or MD / PD | 67 / 22 | 39 / 11 | 0.572 | 46 / 13 | 25 / 5 | 0.780 | 16 / 2 | 11 / 1 | 0.377 | 5 / 7 | 3 / 5 | >0.999 |
| Lymphatic permeation | Yes / No | 78 / 11 | 33 / 17 | 53 / 6 | 9 / 21 | 16 / 2 | 7 / 5 | 0.459 | 9 / 3 | 5 / 3 | 0.642 | ||
| Vascular invasion | Yes / No | 68 / 21 | 25 / 25 | 49 / 10 | 17 / 13 | 11 / 7 | 4 / 8 | 0.263 | 8 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 0.647 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | Yes / No | 51 / 38 | 11 / 39 | 33 / 26 | 8 / 22 | 9 / 9 | 2 / 10 | 0.121 | 9 / 3 | 1 / 7 | |||
| Disease staging | I or II / III or IV | 64 / 25 | 45 / 5 | 0.098 | 43 / 16 | 27 / 3 | 0.099 | 12 / 6 | 12 / 0 | 0.056 | 9 / 3 | 6 / 2 | >0.999 |
| Papillary pattern | Yes / No | 18 / 71 | 14 / 36 | 0.302 | 8 / 51 | 5 / 25 | 0.755 | 10 / 8 | 8 / 4 | 0.708 | 0 / 12 | 1 / 7 | 0.400 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | Yes / No | 40 / 49 | 11 / 39 | 28 / 31 | 6 / 24 | 7 / 11 | 1 / 11 | 0.099 | 5 / 7 | 4 / 4 | >0.999 | ||
| CEA | ≤2.1 / >2.1 | 45 / 44 | 29 / 21 | 0.479 | 26 / 33 | 13 / 17 | >0.999 | 11 / 7 | 7 / 5 | >0.999 | 8 / 4 | 5 / 3 | >0.999 |
| CA19-9 | ≤45.1 / >45.1 | 32 / 57 | 37 / 13 | 22 / 37 | 23 / 7 | 9 / 9 | 9 / 3 | 0.259 | 5 / 7 | 5 / 3 | 0.649 | ||
| Ki-67 | High / Low | 47 / 42 | 15 / 35 | 33 / 26 | 10 / 20 | 0.072 | 10 / 8 | 3 / 9 | 0.141 | 4 / 8 | 2 / 6 | >0.999 | |
| p53 | P / N | 48 / 41 | 23 / 27 | 0.383 | 32 / 27 | 12 / 18 | 0.263 | 12 / 6 | 8 / 4 | >0.999 | 4 / 8 | 3 / 5 | >0.999 |
| CD34 | High / Low | 51 / 38 | 18 / 32 | 34 / 25 | 12 / 18 | 0.124 | 11 / 7 | 3 / 9 | 0.071 | 6 / 6 | 3 / 5 | 0.669 | |
Abbreviation: LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, CC Cholangiocarcinoma, M / F Male / Female, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen, WD or MD / PD Well differentiated or moderate differentiated / poorly differentiated, P /N Positive / Negative, Bold numbers Statistically significant difference.
Univariate and multivariate analysis in overall survival and progression-free survival
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| EHCC | 38.1 | 0.837 | | | | 48.3 | 0.395 | | | |
| IHCC | 28.0 | | | | | 28.2 | | | | |
| GB | 34.5 | | | | | 45.6 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| ≤65 yr | 39.9 | 0.095 | | | | 48.4 | 0.707 | | | |
| ≻65 yr | 27.5 | | | | | 54.7 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 30.2 | 0.267 | | | | 49.7 | 0.634 | | | |
| Female | 33.5 | | | | | 58.6 | | | | |
| | | | | 0.974 to 1.752 | | | | | 0.875 to 1.535 | |
| R0 | 42.5 | 0.075 | 1.300 | 64.2 | 0.310 | 1.154 | ||||
| R1 or R2 | 29.8 | | | | 40.1 | | | |||
| | | | | 0.881 to 1.593 | | | | | 0.729 to 1.307 | |
| Well or moderate | 47.3 | 0.251 | 0.190 | 55.2 | 0.845 | 0.971 | ||||
| Poorly | 7.8 | | | | 39.6 | | | | ||
| | | | | 1.057 to 7.629 | | | | | 1.212 to 10.72 | |
| Yes | 19.9 | 2.555 | 44.9 | 3.139 | ||||||
| No | 79.9 | | | | 81.7 | | | | ||
| | | | 0.939 | 0.468 to 1.939 | | | | | 1.073 to 5.057 | |
| Yes | 20.5 | 0.862 | | 40.2 | 2.244 | |||||
| No | 58.7 | | | | 74.8 | | | |||
| | | | 0.977 | 0.552 to 1.706 | | | | | 0.517 to 4.534 | |
| Positive | 20.5 | 0.935 | | 41.3 | 0.454 | 1.507 | ||||
| Negative | 44.0 | | | | 63.2 | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | 0.922 to 2.980 | |
| I or II | 38.2 | 0.051 | | | | 60.1 | 0.088 | 1.685 | ||
| III or IV | 29.5 | | | | | 26.8 | | | | |
| | | | | 1.196 to 5.321 | | | | | 0.785 to 2.837 | |
| High | 20.3 | 2.414 | 41.1 | 0.242 | 1.449 | |||||
| Low | 59.3 | | | | 71.3 | | | | ||
| | | | | 1.030 to 3.093 | | | | | | |
| High | 29.6 | 1.781 | 49.2 | 0.192 | | | | |||
| Low | 36.2 | | | | 53.6 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Positive | 21.3 | 0.119 | | | | 54.1 | 0.831 | | | |
| Negative | 38.1 | | | | | 51.6 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| High | 28.6 | 0.349 | | | | 51.1 | 0.696 | | | |
| Low | 42.8 | 52.2 | ||||||||
Abbreviation: 95% CI 95% confidence interval, EHCC Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, IHCC Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, GB Gallbladder carcinoma, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen, LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, Bold numbers Statistically significant difference.
Figure 2Outcomes after surgical resection shown by Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to LAT1 and CD98 expression. A statistically significant difference in OS (A) and PFS (B) was observed between patients with high and low LAT1 expression.
Figure 3Effect of LAT inhibition on cellular proliferation and anti-tumor activity of GEM and 5-FU: (A) BCH inhibits [14C]L-leucine uptake concentration-dependently in HuCCT1 cells (n = 4). Ordinate shows a percentage of [14C]L-leucine uptake in the absence of BCH as a control. (B) Expression of LAT1, LAT2, LAT3, and LAT4 mRNA in HuCCT1 cells (n = 4). Ordinate shows relative quantity of mRNA calibrated by LAT1 mRNA. (C) BCH decreases number of HuCCT1 cells concentration-dependently (n = 4). Ordinate shows number of cells in a percentage of control (without BCH). Addition of 10 mM BCH enhances anti-tumor effect of GEM (D) and 5-FU (E) on HuCCT1 cells. Ordinate shows number of cells in a percentage of control (n = 4). A statistically significant difference from the control is indicated by *** (P < 0.001).
Figure 4anti-tumor effect of LAT inhibition on cholangiocarcinoma xenograft. (A) Intravenous administration of BCH shows delay in the growth of HuCCT1 tumor (n = 10). A statistically significant difference from the control is indicated by * (P < 0.05), ** (P < 0.01), and *** (P < 0.001). (B) Changes in the body weight of HuCCT1 tumor-bearing mice after administration of BCH (n = 10). (C) Representative coronal section of 18F-FDG PET images of HuCCT1-bearing mice at 2 h after 18F-FDG injection. PET imaging was performed at indicated day after the day of grouping (n = 2). The calibration bar is shown at right-side of images. SUV max and SUV 50% are shown below the images.