Literature DB >> 22217586

Dental staff doses with handheld dental intraoral x-ray units.

Joel E Gray1, Edgar D Bailey, John B Ludlow.   

Abstract

A handheld portable dental intraoral x-ray system is available in the United States and elsewhere. The system is designed to minimize the user's radiation dose. It includes specially designed shielding of the x-ray tube housing and an integral radiation shield to minimize backscatter. Personnel radiation dose records were obtained from 18 dental facilities using both the handheld system and a wall mounted dental x-ray system, providing 661 individual dose measurements. Dental staff doses were also compared for the handheld and conventional systems using both film and digital imaging for the same facilities and staff members. The results indicate that the doses for the handheld systems are significantly less than for wall-mounted systems. The average monthly dose for the handheld systems was 0.28 μSv vs. 7.86 μSv (deep dose equivalent) for the wall-mounted systems, a difference that is statistically significant at the p = 0.01 level. Consequently, there should be no concern about the use of this handheld dental intraoral x-ray system. Additional shielding efforts, (e.g., wearing a lead apron) will not provide significant benefit nor reduce staff radiation dose.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22217586     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318230778a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  8 in total

1.  The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device.

Authors:  Jimmy Makdissi; Ravikiran R Pawar; Ben Johnson; Bun S Chong
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Operator safety during the acquisition of intraoral images with a handheld and portable X-ray device.

Authors:  Dennis Rottke; Lisa Gohlke; Robert Schrödel; Stefan Hassfeld; Dirk Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Precision of aiming with a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Bram R Meertens; W Erwin R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Diagnostic image quality of hand-held and wall-mounted X-ray devices in bitewing radiography: a non-inferiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Reinier Cornelis Hoogeveen; Siham Ouchene; Wer Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Evaluation of stray radiation to the operator for five hand-held dental X-ray devices.

Authors:  Richard Smith; Richard Tremblay; Graeme M Wardlaw
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images - A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device.

Authors:  Julian Lommen; Lara Schorn; Julia Nitschke; Christoph Sproll; Uwe Zeller; Norbert R Kübler; Jörg Handschel; Henrik Holtmann
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-09-20

7.  The reduction methods of operator's radiation dose for portable dental X-ray machines.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeon Cho; Won-Jeong Han
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-08-29

8.  Image quality of a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Julia Nitschke; Lara Schorn; Henrik Holtmann; Uwe Zeller; Jörg Handschel; David Sonntag; Julian Lommen
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.852

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.