Literature DB >> 29300389

High-throughput in situ X-ray screening of and data collection from protein crystals at room temperature and under cryogenic conditions.

Jana Broecker1, Takefumi Morizumi1, Wei-Lin Ou1, Viviane Klingel1, Anling Kuo1, David J Kissick2, Andrii Ishchenko3, Ming-Yue Lee3, Shenglan Xu2, Oleg Makarov2, Vadim Cherezov3, Craig M Ogata2, Oliver P Ernst1,4.   

Abstract

Protein crystallography has significantly advanced in recent years, with in situ data collection, in which crystals are placed in the X-ray beam within their growth medium, being a major point of focus. In situ methods eliminate the need to harvest crystals, a previously unavoidable drawback, particularly for often small membrane-protein crystals. Here, we present a protocol for the high-throughput in situ X-ray screening of and data collection from soluble and membrane-protein crystals at room temperature (20-25°C) and under cryogenic conditions. The Mylar in situ method uses Mylar-based film sandwich plates that are inexpensive, easy to make, and compatible with automated imaging, and that show very low background scattering. They support crystallization in microbatch and vapor-diffusion modes, as well as in lipidic cubic phases (LCPs). A set of 3D-printed holders for differently sized patches of Mylar sandwich films makes the method robust and versatile, allows for storage and shipping of crystals, and enables automated mounting at synchrotrons, as well as goniometer-based screening and data collection. The protocol covers preparation of in situ plates and setup of crystallization trials; 3D printing and assembly of holders; opening of plates, isolation of film patches containing crystals, and loading them onto holders; basic screening and data-collection guidelines; and unloading of holders, as well as reuse and recycling of them. In situ plates are prepared and assembled in 1 h; holders are 3D-printed and assembled in ≤90 min; and an in situ plate is opened, and a film patch containing crystals is isolated and loaded onto a holder in 5 min.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29300389     DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  55 in total

Review 1.  How many drug targets are there?

Authors:  John P Overington; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Opsin, a structural model for olfactory receptors?

Authors:  Jung Hee Park; Takefumi Morizumi; Yafang Li; Joo Eun Hong; Emil F Pai; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver P Ernst
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin.

Authors:  Jung Hee Park; Patrick Scheerer; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver Peter Ernst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  X-ray transparent microfluidic chips for high-throughput screening and optimization of in meso membrane protein crystallization.

Authors:  Jeremy M Schieferstein; Ashtamurthy S Pawate; Chang Sun; Frank Wan; Paige N Sheraden; Jana Broecker; Oliver P Ernst; Robert B Gennis; Paul J A Kenis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Features and development of Coot.

Authors:  P Emsley; B Lohkamp; W G Scott; K Cowtan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 6.  High-throughput crystallography for structural genomics.

Authors:  Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  How good are my data and what is the resolution?

Authors:  Philip R Evans; Garib N Murshudov
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-06-13

8.  In meso in situ serial X-ray crystallography of soluble and membrane proteins at cryogenic temperatures.

Authors:  Chia Ying Huang; Vincent Olieric; Pikyee Ma; Nicole Howe; Lutz Vogeley; Xiangyu Liu; Rangana Warshamanage; Tobias Weinert; Ezequiel Panepucci; Brian Kobilka; Kay Diederichs; Meitian Wang; Martin Caffrey
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 7.652

Review 9.  Application of in situ diffraction in high-throughput structure determination platforms.

Authors:  Pierre Aller; Juan Sanchez-Weatherby; James Foadi; Graeme Winter; Carina M C Lobley; Danny Axford; Alun W Ashton; Domenico Bellini; Jose Brandao-Neto; Simone Culurgioni; Alice Douangamath; Ramona Duman; Gwyndaf Evans; Stuart Fisher; Ralf Flaig; David R Hall; Petra Lukacik; Marco Mazzorana; Katherine E McAuley; Vitaliy Mykhaylyk; Robin L Owen; Neil G Paterson; Pierpaolo Romano; James Sandy; Thomas Sorensen; Frank von Delft; Armin Wagner; Anna Warren; Mark Williams; David I Stuart; Martin A Walsh
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  16 in total

1.  In Silico Studies Targeting G-protein Coupled Receptors for Drug Research Against Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Agostinho Lemos; Rita Melo; Antonio Jose Preto; Jose Guilherme Almeida; Irina Sousa Moreira; Maria Natalia Dias Soeiro Cordeiro
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

2.  Microfocus diffraction from different regions of a protein crystal: structural variations and unit-cell polymorphism.

Authors:  Michael C Thompson; Duilio Cascio; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 7.652

Review 3.  Purinergic GPCR transmembrane residues involved in ligand recognition and dimerization.

Authors:  Veronica Salmaso; Shanu Jain; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.829

4.  Could the presence of sodium ion influence the accuracy and precision of the ligand-posing in the human A2A adenosine receptor orthosteric binding site using a molecular docking approach? Insights from Dockbench.

Authors:  Enrico Margiotta; Giuseppe Deganutti; Stefano Moro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Pathways and Mechanism of Caffeine Binding to Human Adenosine A2A Receptor.

Authors:  Hung N Do; Sana Akhter; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-27

Review 6.  Molecular Simulations and Drug Discovery of Adenosine Receptors.

Authors:  Jinan Wang; Apurba Bhattarai; Hung N Do; Sana Akhter; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Role of Extracellular Loops and Membrane Lipids for Ligand Recognition in the Neuronal Adenosine Receptor Type 2A: An Enhanced Sampling Simulation Study.

Authors:  Ruyin Cao; Alejandro Giorgetti; Andreas Bauer; Bernd Neumaier; Giulia Rossetti; Paolo Carloni
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  In Silico Drug Design for Purinergic GPCRs: Overview on Molecular Dynamics Applied to Adenosine and P2Y Receptors.

Authors:  Veronica Salmaso; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-26

9.  In situ serial crystallography for rapid de novo membrane protein structure determination.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Huang; Vincent Olieric; Nicole Howe; Rangana Warshamanage; Tobias Weinert; Ezequiel Panepucci; Lutz Vogeley; Shibom Basu; Kay Diederichs; Martin Caffrey; Meitian Wang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-08-27

10.  Insights into adenosine A2A receptor activation through cooperative modulation of agonist and allosteric lipid interactions.

Authors:  Agustín Bruzzese; James A R Dalton; Jesús Giraldo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.