Literature DB >> 30361971

Could the presence of sodium ion influence the accuracy and precision of the ligand-posing in the human A2A adenosine receptor orthosteric binding site using a molecular docking approach? Insights from Dockbench.

Enrico Margiotta1, Giuseppe Deganutti1,2, Stefano Moro3.   

Abstract

The allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by sodium ions has received considerable attention as crystal structures of several receptors, in their inactive conformation, show a Na+ ion bound to specific residues which, in the human A2A adenosine receptor (hA2A AR), are Ser913.39, Trp2466.48, Asn2807.45, and Asn2847.49. A cluster of water molecules completes the coordination of the sodium ion in the putative allosteric site. It is absolutely consolidated that the progress made in the field of GPCRs structural determination has increased the adoption of docking-driven approaches for the identification or the optimization of novel potent and selective ligands. Despite the extensive use of docking protocols in virtual screening approaches, to date, almost any of these studies have been carried out without taking into account the presence of the sodium cation and its first solvation shell in the putative allosteric binding site. In this study, we have focused our attention on determining how the presence of sodium ion binding and additionally its first hydration sphere, in hA2AAR could influence the ligand positioning accuracy during molecular docking simulations for most of the available resting and activated hA2A AR crystal structures, using DockBench as a comparative benchmarking tool and implementing a new correlation coefficient (EM). This work provides indications on the evidence that the posing performance (accuracy and/or precision) of the docking protocols in reproducing the crystallographic poses of different hA2A AR antagonists is generally increased in the presence of the sodium cation and its first solvation shell, in agreement with experimental observations. Consequently, the inclusion of sodium ion and its first solvation shell should be considered in order to facilitate the selection of new potential ligands in all molecular docking-based virtual screening protocols that aim to find novel GPCRs antagonists and inverse agonists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A2A adenosine receptor; Dockbench; Molecular docking; Pose accuracy; Pose precision; Sodium ion binding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361971     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0174-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  46 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Advances in Computational Techniques to Study GPCR-Ligand Recognition.

Authors:  Antonella Ciancetta; Davide Sabbadin; Stephanie Federico; Giampiero Spalluto; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Wijnand T M Mooij; Marcel L Verdonk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-01

5.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Alternative quality assessment strategy to compare performances of GPCR-ligand docking protocols: the human adenosine A(2A) receptor as a case study.

Authors:  Antonella Ciancetta; Alberto Cuzzolin; Stefano Moro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Controlling the Dissociation of Ligands from the Adenosine A2A Receptor through Modulation of Salt Bridge Strength.

Authors:  Elena Segala; Dong Guo; Robert K Y Cheng; Andrea Bortolato; Francesca Deflorian; Andrew S Doré; James C Errey; Laura H Heitman; Adriaan P IJzerman; Fiona H Marshall; Robert M Cooke
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Insights into the structure of class B GPCRs.

Authors:  Kaspar Hollenstein; Chris de Graaf; Andrea Bortolato; Ming-Wei Wang; Fiona H Marshall; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Sodium ion binding pocket mutations and adenosine A2A receptor function.

Authors:  Arnault Massink; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán; Eelke B Lenselink; Natalia V Ortiz Zacarías; Lizi Xia; Laura H Heitman; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Adriaan P IJzerman
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines to develop functionalized ligands to target adenosine receptors: fluorescent ligands as an example.

Authors:  Stephanie Federico; Enrico Margiotta; Silvia Paoletta; Sonja Kachler; Karl-Norbert Klotz; Kenneth A Jacobson; Giorgia Pastorin; Stefano Moro; Giampiero Spalluto
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.597

2.  Conjugable A3 adenosine receptor antagonists for the development of functionalized ligands and their use in fluorescent probes.

Authors:  Stephanie Federico; Enrico Margiotta; Stefano Moro; Eszter Kozma; Zhan-Guo Gao; Kenneth A Jacobson; Giampiero Spalluto
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Homology Modeling of Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in the Age of the Structure Boom.

Authors:  Asma Tiss; Rym Ben Boubaker; Daniel Henrion; Hajer Guissouma; Marie Chabbert
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Sodium or Not Sodium: Should Its Presence Affect the Accuracy of Pose Prediction in Docking GPCR Antagonists?

Authors:  Davide Bassani; Matteo Pavan; Mattia Sturlese; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.