Literature DB >> 29283083

The risk of urinary retention following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on early continence outcomes.

Mansour Alnazari1,2, Marc Zanaty1,2, Khaled Ajib1,2, Assaad El-Hakim2, Kevin C Zorn1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors of acute urinary retention (AUR) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as well as the relationship of AUR with early continence outcomes.
METHODS: The records of 740 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by two experienced surgeons at our institution were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Multiple factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate volume, presence of median lobe, nerve preservation status, anastomosis time, and catheter removal time (Day 4 vs. 7), were evaluated as risk factors for AUR using univariate and multivariate analysis. The relation between AUR and early return of continence (one and three months) post-RARP was also evaluated.
RESULTS: The incidence of clinically significant vesico-urethral anastomotic (VUA) leak and AUR following catheter removal were 0.9% and 2.2% (17/740), respectively. In men who developed AUR, there was no significant relationship with regards to age, BMI, IPSS, prostatic volume, median lobe, nerve preservation, or anastomosis time; however, the incidence of AUR was significantly higher for men with catheter removal at Day 4 (4.5% [16/351]) vs. Day 7 (0.2% [1/389]) (p=0.004). Moreover, patients with early removal of the catheter (Day 4) who developed AUR had an earlier one-month return of 0-pad continence 87.5% (14/16) compared to patients without AUR 45.6% (153/335), with no significant difference at three months.
CONCLUSIONS: While AUR is an uncommon complication of RARP, its incidence is much higher than VUA leakage. Further, it is often not well-discussed during patient counselling preoperatively. Moreover, earlier return of urinary continence was observed in patients experiencing AUR following RARP exclusively with catheter removal at Day 4. Future studies are warranted to validate the long-term impact of AUR on continence outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29283083      PMCID: PMC5869036          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  26 in total

Review 1.  Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rabi Tiguert; Jérôme Rigaud; Yves Fradet
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The rapid uptake of robotic prostatectomy and its collateral effects.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 5.  Best evidence regarding the superiority or inferiority of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  John B Eifler; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Risk and prevention of acute urinary retention after robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tariq A Khemees; Ryan Novak; Ronney Abaza
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable.

Authors:  H Lepor; A M Nieder; M C Fraiman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Nadu; L Salomon; A Hoznek; L E Olsson; F Saint; A de La Taille; A Cicco; D Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Early urinary retention after catheter removal following radical prostatectomy predicts for future symptomatic urethral stricture formation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Montgomery; Bishoy A Gayed; Stephanie Daignault; Jerilyn M Latini; David P Wood; James E Montie; John T Wei; Timothy G Schuster
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rupa Patel; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidence and impact of acute urinary retention after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mohammed Shahait; Mark Hockenberry; N A Suzy; Jessica Kim; Kellie McWilliams; David I Lee
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-03-18

2.  Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Lenart; Ingrid Berger; Judith Böhler; Reinhard Böhm; Georg Gutjahr; Nikolaus Hartig; Daniel Koller; Michael Lamche; Stephan Madersbacher; Michael Stolzlechner; Claudia Elisa Wayand; Anton Ponholzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.