Literature DB >> 25306161

Best evidence regarding the superiority or inferiority of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

John B Eifler1, Michael S Cookson2.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has enjoyed rapid adoption over the past decade without rigorous clinical studies demonstrating superior clinical outcomes over radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). This article reviews the literature comparing RALP and RRP with regard to oncologic, perioperative, and functional outcomes, summarizing evidence for and against the superiority of RALP.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25306161     DOI： 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  3 in total

1.  Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Metastatic Melanoma Results in Durable Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  John T Miura; Lesly A Dossett; Ram Thapa; Youngchul Kim; Aishwarya Potdar; Hala Daou; James Sun; Amod A Sarnaik; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Johannes Bruendl; Martin Drerup; Jonas Herrmann; Hendrik Isbarn; Burkhard Beyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The risk of urinary retention following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on early continence outcomes.

Authors:  Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Khaled Ajib; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.