Literature DB >> 2927630

Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets.

G Berlucchi1, G Tassinari, C A Marzi, M Di Stefano.   

Abstract

It is known that reaction time (RT) for the detection of a light target at extrafoveal locations is lengthened by a previous non-informative light cue at the same location. We describe an additional inhibitory effect from cues remote from the target but occurring within the same lateral or altitudinal visual hemifield. Subjects made a speeded key-press response to the second of two successive light flashes in a pair while maintaining fixation. Each of the two flashes could appear at random in one of four positions, two in the right and two in the left visual fields, or two in the upper and two in the lower visual fields. We found an RT prolongation not only for cued over uncued positions, but also for within-field non-coincident cue-target pairs over between-fields cue-target pairs. The within-field inhibitory effect, though smaller than the same-location effect, was fully apparent even when the target occurred at 1 degree of visual angle from the midline and at 29 degrees from the cue. Both effects were seen with cue-target asynchronies ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 sec. The results are relevant to the understanding of the neural mechanisms for covert shifts of attention across the main meridians of the visual field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2927630     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90172-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

2.  The effect of a non-informative cueing signal in a three-choice reaction-time task.

Authors:  C A Possamaï
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

3.  Inhibition of return in microsaccades.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Elena Betta; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-18

5.  Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-03

6.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

7.  Episodic memory for spatial context biases spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Olivia Lin; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Eye gaze and head orientation modulate the inhibition of return for faces.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?

Authors:  M Corbetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Auditory cues and inhibition of return: the importance of oculomotor activation.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; J N Rosenquist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.