Literature DB >> 8951414

Auditory cues and inhibition of return: the importance of oculomotor activation.

P A Reuter-Lorenz1, J N Rosenquist.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of eccentric auditory cues to clarify the conditions that evoke inhibition of return (IOR). We found that auditory cues positioned 12 degrees to the left or right of midline failed to produce IOR whereas visual cues produced IOR under the same experimental conditions. The eccentric auditory cues elicited automatic orienting as evidenced by more rapid detection of cued than uncued visual targets at short stimulus onset asynchrony. Yet these same cues did not produce IOR unless observers were required to saccade to the cue and back to center before generating a manual detection response. Thus, under the conditions examined herein automatic orienting was not sufficient to evoke IOR, but oculomotor activation appeared to be essential. The functional significance of IOR and the question of modality-specific orienting processes are considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8951414     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; S A Hillyard; S J Luck; M Mouloua; C J Downing; D P Woodward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?

Authors:  M J Farah; A B Wong; M A Monheit; L A Morrow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; G Tassinari; C A Marzi; M Di Stefano
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-11

5.  Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. II. Coordinates of auditory signals.

Authors:  M F Jay; D L Sparks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Audio-ocular response characteristics.

Authors:  J R Zahn; L A Abel; L F Dell'Osso
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1978-03

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses.

Authors:  H C Hughes; P A Reuter-Lorenz; G Nozawa; R Fendrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural correlate of auditory spatial attention allocation in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Abigail Z Rajala; Rick L Jenison; Luis C Populin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Time course of allocation of spatial attention by acoustic cues in non-human primates.

Authors:  Luis C Populin; Abigail Z Rajala
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ming Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Mengying Yuan; Zhongyu Shi; Min Gao; Rongxia Ren; Ming Wei; Yulin Gao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Effects of a pretarget distractor on saccade reaction times across space and time in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Douglas P Munoz; Naomi Takahashi; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.