Literature DB >> 17115222

Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian.

Ulrich W Weger1, Naseem Al-Aidroos, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

Location-based cuing experiments have shown that inhibition of return (IOR) spreads beyond a cued location but appears to be confined to the cued hemifield by the vertical meridian. Previous studies have also shown that IOR can spread across objects and here we investigate whether an object can be used to mediate the spreading of IOR into the opposite hemifield. Two experiments used a rectangular object that surrounded four target locations, two to the left and right of a central fixation point. The spreading of IOR in the presence of the object was determined and compared with a condition where the object-frame was absent. Object-present and object-absent trials were either mixed within a block (Experiment 1) or divided into separate blocks (Experiment 2). Both experiments revealed robust inhibition in the cued but not the uncued hemifield, further demonstrating the hemifield-based spreading of IOR.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17115222     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0104-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  15 in total

1.  Objects of attention, objects of perception.

Authors:  J Avrahami
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  The spatial distribution of inhibition of return.

Authors:  P J Bennett; J Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

3.  Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays.

Authors:  E C Leek; L Reppa; S P Tipper
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-04

4.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.

Authors:  M M Müller; P Malinowski; T Gruber; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J Driver; B Weaver
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

6.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

7.  Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: a unitary mechanism?

Authors:  G Tassinari; D Campara
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; G Tassinari; C A Marzi; M Di Stefano
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Alyanne M De Haan; Juan Lupiañez; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-11

2.  Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; J Vincent Filoteo; David D Song; David P Salmon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.139

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.