Literature DB >> 26178859

Eye gaze and head orientation modulate the inhibition of return for faces.

Adam Palanica1, Roxane J Itier2.   

Abstract

The present study used an inhibition of return (IOR) spatial cueing paradigm to examine how gaze direction and head orientation modulate attention capture for human faces. Target response time (RT) was measured after the presentation of a peripheral cue, which was either a face (with front-facing or averted gaze, in either frontal head view or averted head view) or a house (control). Participants fixated on a centered cross at all times and responded via button press to a peripheral target after a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) from the stimulus cue. At the shortest SOA (150 ms), RTs were shorter for faces than houses, independent of an IOR response, suggesting a cue-based RT advantage elicited by faces. At the longest SOA (2,400 ms), a larger IOR magnitude was found for faces compared to houses. Both the cue-based RT advantage and later IOR responses were modulated by gaze-head congruency; these effects were strongest for frontal gaze faces in frontal head view, and for averted gaze faces in averted head view. Importantly, participants were not given any specific information regarding the stimuli, nor were they told the true purpose of the study. These findings indicate that the congruent combination of head and gaze direction influence the exogenous attention capture of faces during inhibition of return.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face perception; Gaze perception; Inhibition of return; Visuospatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178859      PMCID: PMC4846351          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0961-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  46 in total

1.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials.

Authors:  A Puce; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.

Authors:  S R Langton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-08

3.  Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lizann Bonnar; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

4.  Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: implications for social interactions, attention, and memory.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-12

5.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Judith A Hall; Erik J Coats; Lavonia Smith LeBeau
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The effect of face eccentricity on the perception of gaze direction.

Authors:  Dejan Todorović
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Effects of Peripheral Eccentricity and Head Orientation on Gaze Discrimination.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Psychophysics of perceiving eye-gaze and head direction with peripheral vision: implications for the dynamics of eye-gaze behavior.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Jonathan W Kelly; Matthias Pusch; Jeremy N Bailenson; Andrew C Beall
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Attention Capture by Direct Gaze is Robust to Context and Task Demands.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2012-06-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Gaze-cued shifts of attention and microsaccades are sustained for whole bodies but are transient for body parts.

Authors:  Nicole X Han; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  How wide is the cone of direct gaze?

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Autism Pathogenesis: The Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  Rubin Jure
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.