Literature DB >> 35646194

Effects of disturbance patterns and deadwood on the microclimate in European beech forests.

Dominik Thom1,2,3, Andreas Sommerfeld2, Julius Sebald1,2, Jonas Hagge4, Jörg Müller5,6, Rupert Seidl1,2,7.   

Abstract

More frequent and severe disturbances increasingly open the forest canopy and initiate tree regeneration. Simultaneously, increasing weather extremes, such as drought and heat, are threatening species adapted to cool and moist climate. The magnitude of the microclimatic buffering capacity of forest canopies to mitigate hot and dry weather conditions and its disturbance-induced reduction remains poorly quantified. Also, the influence of disturbance legacies (e.g., deadwood) on forest microclimate is unresolved. In a unique manipulation experiment we investigated (i) the microclimatic buffering capacity of forest canopies in years with different climatic conditions; (ii) the impacts of spatial disturbance patterns on surface light and microclimate; and (iii) the effect of deadwood presence and type on microclimate. Treatments included two disturbance patterns (i.e., aggregated and distributed), four deadwood types (i.e., standing, downed, standing and downed, removed), and one untreated control (i.e., nine treatments in total), replicated at five sites dominated by European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in southeastern Germany. We measured forest floor light conditions and derived diurnal extremes and variation in temperature (T) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) during four consecutive summer seasons (2016 - 2019). The buffering capacity of intact forest canopies was higher in warm and dry years. Surface light was significantly higher in spatially aggregated disturbance gaps compared to distributed disturbances of similar severity. An increase in surface light by 10 % relative to closed canopies elevated Tmax and VPDmax by 0.42°C and 0.04 kPa, respectively. Deadwood presence and type did not affect the forest microclimate significantly. Microclimatic buffering under forest canopies can dampen the effects of climate change. However, increasing canopy disturbances result in more light penetrating the canopy, reducing the microclimatic buffering capacity of forests. We conclude that forest management should foster microclimatic buffering in forests as one element of a multi-pronged strategy to counter climate change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive forest management; Deadwood; Disturbance patterns; Evaporative cooling; Latent heat; Microclimate

Year:  2020        PMID: 35646194      PMCID: PMC7612769          DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Agric For Meteorol        ISSN: 0168-1923            Impact factor:   6.424


  29 in total

1.  Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world.

Authors:  Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming.

Authors:  Pieter De Frenne; Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez; David Anthony Coomes; Lander Baeten; Gorik Verstraeten; Mark Vellend; Markus Bernhardt-Römermann; Carissa D Brown; Jörg Brunet; Johnny Cornelis; Guillaume M Decocq; Hartmut Dierschke; Ove Eriksson; Frank S Gilliam; Radim Hédl; Thilo Heinken; Martin Hermy; Patrick Hommel; Michael A Jenkins; Daniel L Kelly; Keith J Kirby; Fraser J G Mitchell; Tobias Naaf; Miles Newman; George Peterken; Petr Petrík; Jan Schultz; Grégory Sonnier; Hans Van Calster; Donald M Waller; Gian-Reto Walther; Peter S White; Kerry D Woods; Monika Wulf; Bente Jessen Graae; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Tree mortality across biomes is promoted by drought intensity, lower wood density and higher specific leaf area.

Authors:  Sarah Greenwood; Paloma Ruiz-Benito; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Francisco Lloret; Thomas Kitzberger; Craig D Allen; Rod Fensham; Daniel C Laughlin; Jens Kattge; Gerhard Bönisch; Nathan J B Kraft; Alistair S Jump
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Effects of thinning on drought vulnerability and climate response in north temperate forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Anthony W D'Amato; John B Bradford; Shawn Fraver; Brian J Palik
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 5.  Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world.

Authors:  Nate G McDowell; Craig D Allen; Kristina Anderson-Teixeira; Brian H Aukema; Ben Bond-Lamberty; Louise Chini; James S Clark; Michael Dietze; Charlotte Grossiord; Adam Hanbury-Brown; George C Hurtt; Robert B Jackson; Daniel J Johnson; Lara Kueppers; Jeremy W Lichstein; Kiona Ogle; Benjamin Poulter; Thomas A M Pugh; Rupert Seidl; Monica G Turner; Maria Uriarte; Anthony P Walker; Chonggang Xu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Silver fir and Douglas fir are more tolerant to extreme droughts than Norway spruce in south-western Germany.

Authors:  Valentina Vitali; Ulf Büntgen; Jürgen Bauhus
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe's temperate forests over the last three decades.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Dirk Pflugmacher; Yang Zhiqiang; Julius Sebald; Jan Knorn; Mathias Neumann; Patrick Hostert; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Trade-offs between temporal stability and level of forest ecosystem services provisioning under climate change.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.105

9.  Harnessing landscape heterogeneity for managing future disturbance risks in forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Katharina Albrich; Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.789

10.  Natural disturbances are spatially diverse but temporally synchronized across temperate forest landscapes in Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 13.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.