Literature DB >> 2927311

Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: evidence for associative context effects.

U H Frauenfelder, J Segui.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new version of the phoneme monitoring task that is well-suited for the study of lexical processing. The generalized phoneme monitoring (GPM) task, in which subjects detect target phonemes appearing anywhere in the test words, was shown to be sensitive to associative context effects. In Experiment 1, using the standard phoneme monitoring procedure in which subjects detect only word-initial targets, no effect of associative context was obtained. In contrast, clear context effects were observed in Experiment 2, which used the GPM task. Subjects responded faster to word-initial and word-medial targets when the target-bearing words were preceded by an associatively related word than when preceded by an unrelated one. The differential effect of context in the two versions of the phoneme monitoring task was interpreted with reference to task demands and their role in directing selective attention. Experiment 3 showed that the size of the context effect was unaffected by the proportion of related words in the experiment, suggesting that the observed effects were not due to subject strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2927311     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.

Authors:  J R Tweedy; R H Lapinski; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

2.  Cracking the Dual Code: Toward a Unitary Model of Phoneme Identification.

Authors:  Donald J Foss; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav       Date:  1983-12

3.  Interference between phonemes during phoneme monitoring: evidence for an interactive activation model of speech perception.

Authors:  J P Stemberger; J L Elman; P Haden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Attention within auditory word perception: insights from the phonemic restoration illusion.

Authors:  A G Samuel; W H Ressler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

7.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes.

Authors:  K den Heyer; K Briand; G L Dannenbring
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

9.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; G S Waters; M Sanders; P Langer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

10.  Identifying the speech codes.

Authors:  D J Foss; M A Blank
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: searching for sounds in printed pseudowords.

Authors:  Ronald Peereman; Muriele Brand; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

2.  Speeded detection of vowels: a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  A Cutler; B van Ooijen; D Norris; R Sánchez-Casas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

3.  Rhyme decisions to spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  J M McQueen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03

4.  Testing the speech unit hypothesis with the primed matching task: phoneme categories are perceptually basic.

Authors:  S Decoene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

5.  Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Timothy A Howell; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.538

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.