Literature DB >> 25520528

Cracking the Dual Code: Toward a Unitary Model of Phoneme Identification.

Donald J Foss1, Morton Ann Gernsbacher1.   

Abstract

The results of five experiments on the nature of the speech code and on the role of sentence context on speech processing are reported. The first three studies test predictions from the dual code model of phoneme identification (Foss, D. J., & Blank, M. A. Cognitive Psychology, 1980, 12, 1-31). According to that model, subjects in a phoneme monitoring experiment respond to a prelexical code when engaged in a relatively easy task, and to a postlexical code when the task is difficult. The experiments controlled ease of processing either by giving subjects multiple targets for which to monitor or by preceding the target with a similar-sounding phoneme that draws false alarms. The predictions from the model were not sustained. Furthermore, evidence for a paradoxical nonword superiority effect was observed. In Experiment IV reaction times (RTs) to all possible /d/-initial CVCs were gathered. RTs were unaffected by the target item's status as a word or nonword. but they were affected by the internal phonetic structure of the target-bearing item. Vowel duration correlated highly (0.627) with RTs. Experiment V examined previous work purporting to demonstrate that semantic predictability affects how the speech code is processed, in particular that semantic predictability leads to responses based upon a postlexical code. That study found "predictability" effects when words occurred in isolation; further, it found that vowel duration and other phonetic factors can account parsimoniously for the existing results. These factors also account for the apparent nonword superiority effects observed earlier. Implications of the present work for theoretical models that stress the interaction between semantic context and speech processing are discussed, as are implications for use of the phoneme monitoring task.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 25520528      PMCID: PMC4266459          DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90365-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5371


  4 in total

Review 1.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Identifying the speech codes.

Authors:  D J Foss; M A Blank
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Phonemic identification in a phoneme monitoring experiment: the variable role of uncertainty about vowel contexts.

Authors:  D A Swinney; P Prather
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-02
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Vowels as Islands of Reliability.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Keith R Kluender; Donald J Foss; Ellen M Parker; Morton A Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: evidence for associative context effects.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

3.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; P A Luce
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

4.  Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond.

Authors:  Nina Kazanina; Jeffrey S Bowers; William Idsardi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.