Literature DB >> 8768178

Speeded detection of vowels: a cross-linguistic study.

A Cutler1, B van Ooijen, D Norris, R Sánchez-Casas.   

Abstract

In four experiments, listeners' response times to detect vowel targets in spoken input were measured. The first three experiments were conducted in English. In two, one using real words and the other, nonwords, detection accuracy was low, targets in initial syllables were detected more slowly than targets in final syllables, and both response time and missed-response rate were inversely correlated with vowel duration. In a third experiment, the speech context for some subjects included all English vowels, while for others, only five relatively distinct vowels occurred. This manipulation had essentially no effect, and the same response pattern was again observed. A fourth experiment, conducted in Spanish, replicated the results in the first three experiments, except that miss rate was here unrelated to vowel duration. We propose that listeners' responses to vowel targets in naturally spoken input are effectively cautious, reflecting realistic appreciation of vowel variability in natural context.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8768178     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception.

Authors:  M E Schouten; A J van Hessen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Detection thresholds for isolated vowels.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Evolving theories of vowel perception.

Authors:  W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables.

Authors:  J E Andruski; T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui; T Dijkstra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

7.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context.

Authors:  W Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Acoustic and phonological factors in vowel identification.

Authors:  W Strange; T R Edman; J J Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts.

Authors:  L Polka; J F Werker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: cross-linguistic comparisons.

Authors:  A Cutler; N Sebastián-Gallés; O Soler-Vilageliu; B van Ooijen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

2.  Making sense of nonsense in British Sign Language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition.

Authors:  Eleni Orfanidou; Robert Adam; James M McQueen; Gary Morgan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

3.  Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task.

Authors:  B van Ooijen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

4.  Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Michael Grosvald; Christian Lachaud; David Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.