Literature DB >> 8469130

Rhyme decisions to spoken words and nonwords.

J M McQueen1.   

Abstract

Lexical effects in auditory rhyme-decision performance were examined in three experiments. Experiment 1 showed reliable lexical involvement: rhyme-monitoring responses to words were faster than rhyme-monitoring responses to nonwords; and decisions were faster in response to high-frequency as opposed to low-frequency words. Experiments 2 and 3 tested for lexical influences in the rejection of three types of nonrhyming item: words, nonwords with rhyming lexical neighbor (e.G., jop after the cue rob), and nonwords with no rhyming lexical neighbor (e.g., vop after rob). Words were rejected more rapidly than nonwords, and there were reliable differences in the speed and accuracy of rejection of the two types of nonword. The advantage for words over nonwords was replicated for positive rhyme decisions. However, there were no differences in the speed of acceptance, as rhymes, of the two types of nonword. The implications of these results for interactive and autonomous models of spoken word recognition are discussed. It is concluded that the differences in rejection of nonrhyming nonwords are due to the operation of a guessing strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8469130     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they?

Authors:  S Monsell; M C Doyle; P N Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-03

2.  The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity.

Authors:  J M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Integration versus interactive activation: the joint influence of stimulus and context in perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui; T Dijkstra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: evidence for associative context effects.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Word recognition: context effects without priming.

Authors:  D Norris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-03

9.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring.

Authors:  S Donnenwerth-Nolan; M K Tanenhaus; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  On the nature of semantic constraints on lexical access.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-06

2.  A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills.

Authors:  Florian Hintz; Marjolijn Dijkhuis; Vera van 't Hoff; James M McQueen; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.