Literature DB >> 8332427

Testing the speech unit hypothesis with the primed matching task: phoneme categories are perceptually basic.

S Decoene1.   

Abstract

The basic speech unit (phoneme or syllable) problem was investigated with the primed matching task. In primed matching, subjects have to decide whether the elements of stimulus pairs are the same or different. The prime should facilitate matching in as far as its representation is similar to the stimuli to be matched. If stimulus representations generate graded structure, with stimulus instances being more or less prototypical for the category, priming should interact with prototypicality because prototypical instances are more similar to the activated category than are low-prototypical instances. Rosch (1975a, 1975b) showed that, by varying the matching criterion (matching for physical identity or for belonging to the same category), the specific patterns of the priming x prototypicality interaction could differentiate perceptually based from abstract categories. By testing this pattern for phoneme and syllable categories, the abstraction level of these categories can be studied. After finding reliable prototypicality effects for both phoneme and syllable categories (Experiments 1 and 2), primed phoneme matching (Experiments 3 and 4) and primed syllable matching (Experiments 5 and 6) were used under both physical identity instructions and same-category instructions. The results make clear that phoneme categories are represented on the basis of perceptual information, whereas syllable representations are more abstract. The phoneme category can thus be identified as the basic speech unit. Implications for phoneme and syllable representation are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8332427     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  29 in total

1.  Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: the role of acoustic structure.

Authors:  M W Burton; S R Baum; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui; T Dijkstra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.

Authors:  J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

5.  Insights from a failure of selective adaptation: syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants are different.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

6.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual units in speech recognition.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-02

8.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Phonetic prototypes.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

10.  Effects of the match between listener expectancies and coarticulatory cues on the perception of speech.

Authors:  C B Mills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Tamiko Azuma
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2003-10-20

2.  Multi-time resolution analysis of speech: evidence from psychophysics.

Authors:  Maria Chait; Steven Greenberg; Takayuki Arai; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.