Literature DB >> 29271573

A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives.

Sandy Raimondo1, Matthew Etterson2, Nathan Pollesch2, Kristina Garber3, Andrew Kanarek3, Wade Lehmann4, Jill Awkerman1.   

Abstract

The value of models that link organism-level impacts to the responses of a population in ecological risk assessments (ERAs) has been demonstrated extensively over the past few decades. There is little debate about the utility of these models to translate multiple organism-level endpoints into a holistic interpretation of effect to the population; however, there continues to be a struggle for actual application of these models as a common practice in ERA. Although general frameworks for developing models for ERA have been proposed, there is limited guidance on when models should be used, in what form, and how to interpret model output to inform the risk manager's decision. We propose a framework for developing and applying population models in regulatory decision making that focuses on trade-offs of generality, realism, and precision for both ERAs and models. We approach the framework development from the perspective of regulators aimed at defining the needs of specific models commensurate with the assessment objective. We explore why models are not widely used by comparing their requirements and limitations with the needs of regulators. Using a series of case studies under specific regulatory frameworks, we classify ERA objectives by trade-offs of generality, realism, and precision and demonstrate how the output of population models developed with these same trade-offs informs the ERA objective. We examine attributes for both assessments and models that aid in the discussion of these trade-offs. The proposed framework will assist risk assessors and managers to identify models of appropriate complexity and to understand the utility and limitations of a model's output and associated uncertainty in the context of their assessment goals. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:369-380. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  Ecological risk assessment; Framework; Model complexity; Population modeling; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29271573      PMCID: PMC6052766          DOI: 10.1002/ieam.2024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  21 in total

Review 1.  Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.

Authors:  Udo Hommen; J M Hans Baveco; Nika Galic; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Adverse outcome pathways and ecological risk assessment: bridging to population-level effects.

Authors:  Vincent J Kramer; Matthew A Etterson; Markus Hecker; Cheryl A Murphy; Guritno Roesijadi; Daniel J Spade; Julann A Spromberg; Magnus Wang; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Ecological models in support of regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Udo Hommen; Pernille Thorbek; Fred Heimbach; Paul J Van den Brink; Jörn Wogram; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Volker Grimm
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences.

Authors:  N Oreskes; K Shrader-Frechette; K Belitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantifying the effects of pesticide exposure on annual reproductive success of birds.

Authors:  Matthew A Etterson; Richard S Bennett
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.992

7.  Assessing pesticide risks to threatened and endangered species using population models: Findings and recommendations from a CropLife America Science Forum.

Authors:  V E Forbes; R Brain; D Edwards; N Galic; T Hall; J Honegger; C Meyer; D R J Moore; D Nacci; R Pastorok; T G Preuss; S F Railsback; C Salice; R M Sibly; B Tenhumberg; P Thorbek; M Wang
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Ecological models in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment: an introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Nika Galic; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 9.  Assessing the risks of pesticides to threatened and endangered species using population modeling: A critical review and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Nika Galic; Amelie Schmolke; Janna Vavra; Rob Pastorok; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides spinosad and diazinon.

Authors:  John D Stark; Roger I Vargas
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.291

View more
  10 in total

1.  A unified approach for protecting listed species and ecosystem services in isolated wetlands using community-level protection goals.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Leah Sharpe; Leah Oliver; Kelly R McCaffrey; S Thomas Purucker; Sumathy Sinnathamby; Jeffrey M Minucci
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Simulated developmental and reproductive impacts on amphibian populations and implications for assessing long-term effects.

Authors:  Jill A Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Coupling toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic and population models for assessing aquatic ecological risks to time-varying pesticide exposures.

Authors:  Glen Thursby; Keith Sappington; Matthew Etterson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Moving beyond Risk Quotients: Advancing Ecological Risk Assessment to Reflect Better, More Robust and Relevant Methods.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Valery E Forbes
Journal:  Ecologies (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

6.  Endogenous Lifecycle Models for Chemical Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Matthew A Etterson; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  Guidance for Developing Amphibian Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jill Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nika Galic; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Katherine Kapo; Chiara Accolla; Maxime Vaugeois; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Pop-guide: Population modeling guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nathan Pollesch; Chiara Accolla; Nika Galic; Adrian Moore; Maxime Vaugeois; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Andrew Kanarek; Jill Awkerman; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Assessing the population relevance of endocrine-disrupting effects for nontarget vertebrates exposed to plant protection products.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Nina Hallmark; Laurent Lagadic; Katharina Ott; Dan Pickford; Thomas Preuss; Helen Thompson; Pernille Thorbek; Lennart Weltje; James R Wheeler
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.992

10.  Honey bee colony-level exposure and effects in realistic landscapes: An application of BEEHAVE simulating clothianidin residues in corn pollen.

Authors:  Amelie Schmolke; Farah Abi-Akar; Silvia Hinarejos
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.