Literature DB >> 34748315

Endogenous Lifecycle Models for Chemical Risk Assessment.

Matthew A Etterson1, Gerald T Ankley1.   

Abstract

Despite over 50 years of research on the use of population models in chemical risk assessment, their practical utility has remained elusive. A novel application and interpretation of ecotoxicological models, Endogenous Lifecycle Models (ELM), is proposed that offers some of the benefits sought from population models, at much lower cost of design, parametrization, and verification. ELMs capture the endogenous lifecycle processes of growth, development, survival, and reproduction and integrate these to estimate and predict expected fitness. Two measures of fitness are proposed as natural model predictions in the context of chemical risk assessment, lifetime reproductive success, and the expected annual propagation of genetic descendants, including self (intrinsic fitness). Six characteristics of the ELM approach are reviewed and illustrated with two ELM examples, the first for a general passerine lifecycle and the second for bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Throughout, the focus is on development of robust qualitative model predictions that depend as little as possible on specific parameter values. Thus, ELMs sacrifice precision to optimize generality in understanding the effects of chemicals across the diversity of avian lifecycles. Notably, the ELM approach integrates naturally with the adverse outcome pathway framework; this integration can be employed as a midtier risk assessment tool when lower tier analyses suggest potential risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endogenous Lifecycle Models; MCnest; adverse outcome pathways; birds; environmental contaminants; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34748315      PMCID: PMC9195053          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  29 in total

1.  Integrating population modeling into ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Peter Calow; Volker Grimm; Takehiko Hayashi; Tjalling Jager; Annemette Palmqvist; Rob Pastorok; Dan Salvito; Richard Sibly; Julann Spromberg; John Stark; Richard A Stillman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  Ecological models and pesticide risk assessment: current modeling practice.

Authors:  Amelie Schmolke; Pernille Thorbek; Peter Chapman; Volker Grimm
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Adverse outcome pathways and ecological risk assessment: bridging to population-level effects.

Authors:  Vincent J Kramer; Matthew A Etterson; Markus Hecker; Cheryl A Murphy; Guritno Roesijadi; Daniel J Spade; Julann A Spromberg; Magnus Wang; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Incorporating results of avian toxicity tests into a model of annual reproductive success.

Authors:  Richard S Bennett; Matthew A Etterson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Assessing pesticide risks to threatened and endangered species using population models: Findings and recommendations from a CropLife America Science Forum.

Authors:  V E Forbes; R Brain; D Edwards; N Galic; T Hall; J Honegger; C Meyer; D R J Moore; D Nacci; R Pastorok; T G Preuss; S F Railsback; C Salice; R M Sibly; B Tenhumberg; P Thorbek; M Wang
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Lessons from 30 years of population viability analysis of wildlife populations.

Authors:  Robert C Lacy
Journal:  Zoo Biol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 1.421

7.  Linkage of biochemical responses to population-level effects: a case study with vitellogenin in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).

Authors:  David H Miller; Kathleen M Jensen; Daniel L Villeneuve; Michael D Kahl; Elizabeth A Makynen; Elizabeth J Durhan; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff, Philomachus pugnax: a mixed ESS?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Pop-guide: Population modeling guidance, use, interpretation, and development for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nathan Pollesch; Chiara Accolla; Nika Galic; Adrian Moore; Maxime Vaugeois; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Andrew Kanarek; Jill Awkerman; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  A spatially explicit model for estimating risks of pesticide exposure to bird populations.

Authors:  Matthew Etterson; Nathan Schumaker; Kristina Garber; Steven Lennartz; Andrew Kanarek; Jennifer Connolly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Moving beyond Risk Quotients: Advancing Ecological Risk Assessment to Reflect Better, More Robust and Relevant Methods.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Valery E Forbes
Journal:  Ecologies (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.