Literature DB >> 14575672

Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides spinosad and diazinon.

John D Stark1, Roger I Vargas.   

Abstract

The toxicity of the natural insecticide spinosad was assessed against Daphnia pulex (Leydig) using a demographic approach. Data were also generated for the commonly used organophosphorus insecticide diazinon as a comparison. Exposure to spinosad led to a concentration-dependent decline in survival, birth rate (b), net reproductive rate (R(0)), and intrinsic rate of increase (r(m)). Population extinction (-r(m)) occurred after exposure to spinosad concentrations >10 microg/L for 8 days. Exposure to increasing diazinon concentrations led to an initial increase in R(0) and r(m) followed by a sharp decline, with extinction occurring after exposure to >2 microg/L after 2 days. Based on concentrations of pesticide that caused population extinction, spinosad was five times less toxic than diazinon. The stable age distribution (after 65 days) of D. pulex changed after exposure to spinosad and diazinon. Increasing concentrations of spinosad resulted in a decrease in the percentages of individuals in the first juvenile and adult stages, increase in the third and fourth juvenile stages, and little or no change in the second juvenile and adolescent stages. Diazinon had a different effect on stable age distribution. Increasing concentrations of diazinon resulted in an increase in percentages of individuals in the first and second juvenile stages, little or no change in the third and fourth juvenile stages and adolescent stage, and a decrease in the adult stage. Although spinosad and diazinon are both neurotoxins, they have different modes of action and populations of D. pulex reacted differently to each pesticide. Results of this study indicate that spinosad is significantly less toxic than diazinon to D. pulex and because it is applied at lower concentrations than diazinon it should be less hazardous to this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575672     DOI: 10.1016/s0147-6513(02)00074-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  6 in total

1.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress.

Authors:  John D Stark; John E Banks; Roger Vargas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A comparison of simple and complex population models to reduce uncertainty in ecological risk assessments of chemicals: example with three species of Daphnia.

Authors:  Niklas Hanson; John D Stark
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Matthew Etterson; Nathan Pollesch; Kristina Garber; Andrew Kanarek; Wade Lehmann; Jill Awkerman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Population-level effects of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis in Daphnia pulex and Daphnia magna: comparison of laboratory and field microcosm exposure conditions.

Authors:  Claire Duchet; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Evelyne Franquet; Christophe Lagneau; Laurent Lagadic
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Spinosad: a biorational mosquito larvicide for use in car tires in southern Mexico.

Authors:  Carlos F Marina; J Guillermo Bond; José Muñoz; Javier Valle; Nelva Chirino; Trevor Williams
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Environmental risk assessment of fluctuating diazinon concentrations in an urban and agricultural catchment using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Irene Wittmer; Christian Stamm; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.