Literature DB >> 35188648

In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Maria Chiara Astuto1, Matteo R Di Nicola2, José V Tarazona1, A Rortais1, Yann Devos1, A K Djien Liem1, George E N Kass1, Maria Bastaki1, Reinhilde Schoonjans1, Angelo Maggiore1, Sandrine Charles3, Aude Ratier3, Christelle Lopes3, Ophelia Gestin3, Tobin Robinson1, Antony Williams4, Nynke Kramer5, Edoardo Carnesecchi5, Jean-Lou C M Dorne6.   

Abstract

This chapter aims to introduce the reader to the basic principles of environmental risk assessment of chemicals and highlights the usefulness of tiered approaches within weight of evidence approaches in relation to problem formulation i.e., data availability, time and resource availability. In silico models are then introduced and include quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, which support filling data gaps when no chemical property or ecotoxicological data are available. In addition, biologically-based models can be applied in more data rich situations and these include generic or species-specific models such as toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models, dynamic energy budget models, physiologically based models, and models for ecosystem hazard assessment i.e. species sensitivity distributions and ultimately for landscape assessment i.e. landscape-based modeling approaches. Throughout this chapter, particular attention is given to provide practical examples supporting the application of such in silico models in real-world settings. Future perspectives are discussed to address environmental risk assessment in a more holistic manner particularly for relevant complex questions, such as the risk assessment of multiple stressors and the development of harmonized approaches to ultimately quantify the relative contribution and impact of single chemicals, multiple chemicals and multiple stressors on living organisms.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic energy budget models; Environmental risk assessment; Landscape modeling; Physiologically based models; Quantitative structure–activity relationship models

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35188648     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  85 in total

Review 1.  Systems toxicology approaches for understanding the joint effects of environmental chemical mixtures.

Authors:  David J Spurgeon; Oliver A H Jones; Jean-Lou C M Dorne; Claus Svendsen; Suresh Swain; Stephen R Stürzenbaum
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Integrating in silico models and read-across methods for predicting toxicity of chemicals: A step-wise strategy.

Authors:  Emilio Benfenati; Qasim Chaudhry; Giuseppina Gini; Jean Lou Dorne
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Testing the thresholds of toxicological concern values using a new database for food-related substances.

Authors:  Linda Reilly; Rositsa Serafimova; Falko Partosch; Ursula Gundert-Remy; José Cortiñas Abrahantes; Jean-Lou M C Dorne; George E N Kass
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 4.  Regulatory assessment and risk management of chemical mixtures: challenges and ways forward.

Authors:  Stephanie K Bopp; Aude Kienzler; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Sander C van der Linden; Alicia Paini; Nikolaos Parissis; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 5.  EFSA's OpenFoodTox: An open source toxicological database on chemicals in food and feed and its future developments.

Authors:  J L C M Dorne; J Richardson; A Livaniou; E Carnesecchi; L Ceriani; R Baldin; S Kovarich; M Pavan; E Saouter; F Biganzoli; L Pasinato; M Zare Jeddi; T P Robinson; G E N Kass; A K D Liem; A A Toropov; A P Toropova; C Yang; A Tarkhov; N Georgiadis; M R Di Nicola; A Mostrag; H Verhagen; A Roncaglioni; E Benfenati; A Bassan
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 6.  Toxicokinetic models and related tools in environmental risk assessment of chemicals.

Authors:  Audrey Grech; Céline Brochot; Jean-Lou Dorne; Nadia Quignot; Frédéric Y Bois; Rémy Beaudouin
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Dynamic energy budget models in ecological risk assessment: From principles to applications.

Authors:  Jan Baas; Starrlight Augustine; Gonçalo M Marques; Jean-Lou Dorne
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 8.  Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.

Authors:  Antony J Williams; Jason C Lambert; Kris Thayer; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Editorial: OpenFoodTox: EFSA's open source toxicological database on chemical hazards in food and feed.

Authors:  Jean Lou Dorne; Jane Richardson; Georges Kass; Nikolaos Georgiadis; Mario Monguidi; Luca Pasinato; Stefano Cappe; Hans Verhagen; Tobin Robinson
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2017-01-18

10.  Defining the Human-Biota Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Organic Chemicals in Freshwater: The Proposed Strategy of the LIFE VERMEER Project Using VEGA Tools.

Authors:  Diego Baderna; Roberta Faoro; Gianluca Selvestrel; Adrien Troise; Davide Luciani; Sandrine Andres; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.