| Literature DB >> 29264541 |
Carolina Bastos da Cunha1, Fernando Sicuro2, Priscila Alves Maranhão3, Marcos Antonio Borges1, Fátima Z Cyrino2, Fernanda Mussi Gazolla1, Isabel Rey Madeira1, Maria Alice Neves Bordallo1, Eliete Bouskela2, Luiz Guilherme Kraemer-Aguiar1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that microvascular dysfunction (MD) is associated with a number of cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity. Few studies have assessed microvascular reactivity in children, and in most of these, results were confounded by the effects of puberty. Our aim was to establish whether MD is already present in obese prepubertal children.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular risk; children; microcirculation; obesity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29264541 PMCID: PMC5686770 DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocr Soc ISSN: 2472-1972
Clinical, Anthropometric, and Laboratory Variables of Participants, According to the SDS for BMI
| Characteristic | C | OW | OB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants | 28 | 18 | 52 | |
| Age (y) | 7.39 ± 1.03 | 7.33 ± 1.46 | 7.51 ± 1.26 | 0.8265 |
| Sex (M/F) | 14/14 | 5/13 | 26/26 | 0.232 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 15.64 ± 1.19 | 19.65 ± 1.14 | 25.24 ± 3.63 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 25.33 ± 4.67 | 31.84 ± 5.71 | 44.63 ± 9.62 | <0.001 |
| MAP | 63.33 [60.0–63.33] | 63.33 [62.50–73.33] | 70.0 [63.33–73.33] | <0.01 |
| Waist-to-height ratio | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | <0.001 |
| WC (cm) | 55.59 ± 3.38 | 64.72 ± 5.11 | 80.03 ± 9.88 | <0.001 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 83.57 ± 6.26 | 88.83 ± 8.56 | 87.85 ± 7.64 | 0.025 |
| Insulin (mUI/L) | 2.45 [1.22–4.02] | 6.1 [ 3.47–7.30] | 8.25 [ 4.35–13.48] | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.50 [ 0.25–0.80] | 1.16 [ 0.74–1.76] | 1.78 [ 0.97–2.94] | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 70.0 [54.25–95.0] | 76.0 [57.25–92.25] | 90.0 [69.50–130.0] | 0.0392 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 146.14 ± 29.31 | 162.59 ± 28.26 | 168.80 ± 28.86 | 0.004 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 45.70 ± 8.66 | 51.21 ± 8.79 | 40.99 ± 8.92 | <0.001 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 83.98 ± 29.68 | 95.35 ± 25.72 | 105.81 ± 26.83 | 0.004 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 3.50 [2.90–3.90] | 3.70 [3.07–4.25] | 3.95 [3.50–4.70] | 0.007 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dL) | 0.09 [0.06–0.18] | 0.12 [0.08–0.43] | 0.28 [0.14–0.50] | <0.001 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 3.85 [2.05–5.07] | 8.06 [5.27–18.18] | 19.55 [10.45–27.35] | <0.001 |
| Adiponectin (μg/mL) | 12.85 [9.26–17.08] | 10.92 [8.37–16.45] | 10.21 [7.26–15.57] | 0.2434 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 1.84 [1.50–3.15] | 2.38 [1.50–3.64] | 2.79 [1.89–3.73] | 0.104 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median [first to third quartiles].
Abbreviations: IL-6, interleukin-6; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MAP, mean arterial pressure; WC, waist circumference.
C vs OW, P < 0.001.
C vs OB, P < 0.001.
OW vs OB, P < 0.001.
C vs OW, P < 0.01.
C vs OB, P < 0.05.
C vs OB, P < 0.01.
OW vs OB, P < 0.05.
Comparison of Microvascular Reactivity Between Controls, Overweight, and Obese Prepubertal Children
| Characteristic | C | OW | OB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional capillary densities (n/mm2) | ||||
| FCDm | 5.50 [4.82–7.27] | 7.05 [5.25–9.35] | 6.85 [5.45–7.65] | 0.107 |
| FCDc | 6.10 [4.80–7.55] | 7.40 [6.15–9.72] | 7.40 [5.00–8.80] | 0.192 |
| RBCV (mm/s) | 0.34 [0.30–0.50] | 0.33 [0.32–0.33] | 0.33 [0.31–0.34] | 0.352 |
| RBCVmax (mm/s) | 0.38 [0.37–0.59] | 0.37 [0.37–0.38] | 0.37 [0.37–0.39] | 0.265 |
| TRBCVmax (s) | 4.0 [3.25–5.0] | 4.0 [3.0–5.0] | 4.0 [3.0–5.0] | 0.483 |
Values are presented as median [first to third quartiles].
Abbreviations: FCDc, central functional capillary density; FCDm, mean functional capillary density; TRBCVmax, time to peak RBCVmax during PORH.
Factor Structure Matrix
| Characteristic | Root 1 | Root 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Waist-to-height ratio | 0.17 | |
| HDL | ||
| hs-CRP | ||
| FCDm | 0.07 | |
| Glucose | ||
| Adiponectin | −0.01 | 0.23 |
| RBCVmax | ||
| Eigenvalue | 2.53 | 0.35 |
| Proportional accumulated variation, % | 87.9 | 100.0 |
The sign indicates the direct or inverse correlation between the root and variable. Marked in bold are the highest values according to the root. The higher the value of the variable of the load, the greater the influence of it on the canonical root and, hence, the influence of this variable in the separation of groups.
Abbreviation: FCDm, mean functional capillary density.
Figure 1.Bivariate distribution of canonical roots 1 and 2. FCDm, mean functional capillary density; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2.Bivariate distribution according to central adiposity (waist-to-height ratio). Higher ratios represent waist-to-height ratios greater than or equal to 0.5; lower ratios represent waist-to-height ratios less than 0.5. BP, blood pressure; CRP, C-reactive protein; Uric ac., uric acid.