Literature DB >> 29251401

Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects.

Syed Amal Hussnain1, Kyle D Kovacs1, Joshua L Warren2, Christopher C Teng1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Corneal hysteresis (CH) is a dynamic marker of structural and functional changes in the cornea associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness, but its utility in assessing primary angle closure suspects (PACS) has not been fully elucidated.
BACKGROUND: This study assesses if anterior segment measurements correlate with CH in PACS patients.
DESIGN: IRB-approved retrospective review of imaging and records at a university practice. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three eyes from 37 patients diagnosed as PACS, without other ocular pathology.
METHODS: Every eye underwent measurements including: ocular response analyzer (ORA), anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) and a clinical evaluation. ORA measurements were correlated with other anatomic parameters using a mixed effects multivariable linear regression framework. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ORA measurements included: CH, corneal resistance factor, Goldmann IOP (IOPg ) and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc ). Anterior segment OCT measurements included: central corneal thickness (CCTOCT ), nasal and temporal peripheral corneal thicknesses (PCT1 and PCT2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), nasal angle to temporal angle distance (ATA) and temporal and nasal angle measurements. Clinical measurements included: central corneal thickness via pachymetry, IOP measured by Goldmann applanation, axial length by A-scan ultrasound and spherical equivalent.
RESULTS: CH was negatively correlated with IOPcc, and ACD CH was positively correlated with CCTOCT , CCTp , CRF, PCT1 and PCT2. Females were found to have lower CH. In multivariable regression controlling for gender, CCT, PCT, IOP and ACD, no correlation was seen between CH and anatomic measurements. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: CH values in PACS do not correlate with anterior segment anatomy.
© 2017 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal hysteresis; glaucoma; optical coherence tomography; primary angle-closure glaucoma suspects

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29251401      PMCID: PMC8327184          DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  22 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 2.  Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Mitsugu Shimmyo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Lack of Association Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor With Glaucoma Severity in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.

Authors:  Monisha E Nongpiur; Monisha E Nongpiur; Owen Png; Jestin W Chiew; Kenric R Fan; Michael J A Girard; Tina Wong; David Goh; Shamira A Perera; Tin Aung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.

Authors:  Sushma Tejwani; Sathi Devi; Shoruba Dinakaran; Rohit Shetty; Priti Meshram; Mathew Francis; Abhijit Sinha Roy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Alicia C How; Mani Baskaran; Rajesh S Kumar; Mingguang He; Paul J Foster; Raghavan Lavanya; Hon-Tym Wong; Paul T K Chew; David S Friedman; Tin Aung
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Matthew E Emanuel; Richard K Parrish; Steven J Gedde
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Shavon C Billingsley; Amita D Patel; Kathy D Halverson; Brooks R Alldredge; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Daniel Meira-Freitas; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis after pars plana vitrectomy combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Manami Ohta; Makiko Wakuta; Ayano Sakuma; Mina Hasegawa; Waka Hamada; Fumiaki Higashijima; Takuya Yoshimoto; Tadahiko Ogata; Yuka Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Kimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Corvis Biomechanical Factor Facilitates the Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chou; Po-Jen Shih; Chun-Yuan Wang; Tzuu-Shuh Jou; Jun-Peng Chen; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.