Literature DB >> 24857435

Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics.

Cynthia J Roberts1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This review looks at biomechanical concepts and misconceptions related to in vivo assessment of corneal biomechanical response via air-puff deformation, including both human donor corneas and the translation of similar concepts to clinical studies. The impact of corneal viscoelasticity on interpreting clinical data is discussed, as well as the differences between 2 clinical devices that produce air puffs with distinct temporal and magnitude profiles. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Roberts is a consultant to Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH and Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG and has received research funding from Carl Zeiss Meditec AG as well as travel funds from Sooft Italia. She has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24857435     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  58 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Jiaonan Ma; Yan Wang; Weiting Hao; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Multi-meridian corneal imaging of air-puff induced deformation for improved detection of biomechanical abnormalities.

Authors:  Andrea Curatolo; Judith S Birkenfeld; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; James A Germann; Geethika Muralidharan; Jesús Palací; Daniel Pascual; Ashkan Eliasy; Ahmed Abass; Jędrzej Solarski; Karol Karnowski; Maciej Wojtkowski; Ahmed Elsheikh; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Evaluation of corneal biomechanics in patients with keratectasia following LASIK using dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Ryotaro Ueki; Naoyuki Maeda; Mutsumi Fuchihata; Tomoko Asai; Shizuka Koh; Hisataka Fujimoto; Masafumi Uematsu; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Changes in ocular biomechanics after treatment for active Graves' orbitopathy.

Authors:  H X Li; X H Zhao; Y Song; B K Mu; Y Pan; H Zhao; Y Wang
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects.

Authors:  Syed Amal Hussnain; Kyle D Kovacs; Joshua L Warren; Christopher C Teng
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  Biomechanical Diagnostics of the Cornea.

Authors:  Vinicius S De Stefano; William J Dupps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2017

7.  Custom air puff-derived biomechanical variables in a refractive surgery screening setting: Study from 2 centers.

Authors:  Vinicius S De Stefano; Ibrahim Seven; J Bradley Randleman; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Analyzing biomechanical parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Karin R Pillunat; Cosima Hermann; Eberhard Spoerl; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Corneal biomechanics: Measurement and structural correlations.

Authors:  Jillian Chong; William J Dupps
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].

Authors:  J Steinberg; J Mehlan; A Frings; V Druchkiv; G Richard; T Katz; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.