Literature DB >> 23642371

Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study.

Felipe A Medeiros1, Daniel Meira-Freitas, Renato Lisboa, Tung-Mei Kuang, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of corneal hysteresis (CH) as a risk factor for the rate of visual field progression in a cohort of patients with glaucoma followed prospectively over time.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study group included 114 eyes of 68 patients with glaucoma followed for an average of 4.0 ± 1.1 years. Visual fields were obtained with standard automated perimetry. Included eyes had a median number of 7 (range, 5-12) tests during follow-up.
METHODS: The CH measurements were acquired at baseline using the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Instruments, Depew, NY). Evaluation of rates of visual field change during follow-up was performed using the visual field index (VFI). Linear mixed models were used to investigate the relationship between rates of visual field loss and baseline CH, baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT), while adjusting for potentially confounding factors. An interaction term between IOP and CH was included in the model to investigate whether the effect of IOP on rates of progression depended on the level of CH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effects of CH, IOP, and CCT on rates of VFI loss over time.
RESULTS: The CH had a significant effect on rates of visual field progression over time. In the univariable model including only CH as a predictive factor along with time and their interaction, each 1 mmHg lower CH was associated with a 0.25%/year faster rate of VFI decline over time (P<0.001). The multivariable model showed that the effect of IOP on rates of progression depended on CH. Eyes with high IOP and low CH were at increased risk for having fast rates of disease progression. The CH explained a larger proportion of the variation in slopes of VFI change than CCT (17.4% vs. 5.2%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The CH measurements were significantly associated with risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes with lower CH had faster rates of visual field loss than those with higher CH. The prospective longitudinal design of this study supports the role of CH as an important factor to be considered in the assessment of the risk of progression in patients with glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23642371      PMCID: PMC3804228          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  41 in total

1.  Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.

Authors:  Ronghui Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Longitudinal studies with continuous responses.

Authors:  N M Laird; C Donnelly; J H Ware
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Rates of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma measured by scanning laser polarimetry.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  A clinical description of Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.

Authors:  William Lau; David Pye
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.

Authors:  Carlos V Gustavo De Moraes; Victoria Hill; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  D R Anderson; S M Drance; M Schulzer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Makoto Aihara; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Olivia Abitbol; Jihène Bouden; Serge Doan; Thanh Hoang-Xuan; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Anthony P Wells; David F Garway-Heath; Ali Poostchi; Tracey Wong; Kenneth C Y Chan; Nisha Sachdev
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  82 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanical changes after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.

Authors:  Rana Sorkhabi; Farhad Najafzadeh; Ali Sadeghi; Mohamadhosein Ahoor; Ali Mahdavifard
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Investigate Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Predicting Development of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Carolina N Susanna; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Fábio B Daga; Bianca N Susanna; Feilin Zhu; Nara G Ogata; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Critical pathway for primary open angle glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Alejandro R Allocco; Julia A Ponce; Maria J Riera; Mauricio G Magurno
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Relationship of Corneal Hysteresis and Anterior Lamina Cribrosa Displacement in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Brandon J Wong; Sasan Moghimi; Linda M Zangwill; Mark Christopher; Akram Belghith; Eren Ekici; Christopher Bowd; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Joshua S Hardin; Christopher I Lee; Lydia F Lane; Christian C Hester; R Grant Morshedi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A survey of preoperative blood tests in primary open-angle glaucoma patients versus cataract surgery patients.

Authors:  Laura P Cohen; Jessica Wong; Aliya Z Jiwani; Scott H Greenstein; Stacey C Brauner; Sherleen C Chen; Angela V Turalba; Teresa C Chen; Lucy Shen; Douglas J Rhee; Janey L Wiggs; Jae Hee Kang; Stephanie Loomis; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-30

8.  In Vivo Noninvasive Measurement of Young's Modulus of Elasticity in Human Eyes: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Arthur J Sit; Shuai-Chun Lin; Arash Kazemi; Jay W McLaren; Christopher M Pruet; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients.

Authors:  Melis Palamar; Cumali Degirmenci; Ilgen Ertam; Ayse Yagci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  The association between corneal hysteresis and surgical outcomes from trabecular meshwork microinvasive glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Nathaniel Tracer; Samantha Ayoub; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.