Literature DB >> 29236552

Website Designs for Communicating About Chemicals in Cigarette Smoke.

Allison J Lazard1, M Justin Byron2,3, Huyen Vu3, Ellen Peters4, Annie Schmidt2, Noel T Brewer2,3.   

Abstract

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act requires the US government to inform the public about the quantities of toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke. A website can accomplish this task efficiently, but the site's user interface must be usable to benefit the general public. We conducted online experiments with national convenience samples of 1,451 US adult smokers and nonsmokers to examine the impact of four interface display elements: the chemicals, their associated health effects, quantity information, and a visual risk indicator. Outcomes were perceptions of user experience (perceived clarity and usability), motivation (willingness to use), and potential impact (elaboration about the harms of smoking). We found displaying health effects as text with icons, providing quantity information for chemicals (e.g., ranges), and showing a visual risk indicator all improved the user experience of a webpage about chemicals in cigarette smoke (all p < .05). Displaying a combination of familiar and unfamiliar chemicals, providing quantity information for chemicals, and showing a visual risk indicator all improved motivation to use the webpage (all p < .05). Displaying health effects or quantity information increased the potential impact of the webpage (all p < .05). Overall, interface designs displaying health effects of chemicals in cigarette smoke as text with icons and with a visual risk indicator had the greatest impact on the user experience, motivation, and potential impact of the website. Our findings provide guidance for accessible website designs that can inform consumers about the toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29236552      PMCID: PMC6031476          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1407276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  16 in total

1.  Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Nathan Dieckmann; Anna Dixon; Judith H Hibbard; C K Mertz
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Robert Logan; Catherine Arnott Smith; Gondy Leroy; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges.

Authors:  Larry Goldberg; Bettijoyce Lide; Svetlana Lowry; Holly A Massett; Trisha O'Connell; Jennifer Preece; Whitney Quesenbery; Ben Shneiderman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Melissa B Gilkey; Sarah E Lillie; Bradford W Hesse; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Alice R Richman; Jessica T DeFrank; Valerie F Reyna; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence.

Authors:  Peter S Houts; Cecilia C Doak; Leonard G Doak; Matthew J Loscalzo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-08-24

Review 7.  Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marra G Katz; Sunil Kripalani; Barry D Weiss
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 2.637

8.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

Review 9.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Communicating about chemicals in cigarette smoke: impact on knowledge and misunderstanding.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard; M Justin Byron; Ellen Peters; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Is a cigarette brand with fewer chemicals safer? Public perceptions in two national US experiments.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Allison J Lazard; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Patrick Boyd; Linda D Cameron; Noshir Contractor; Michael A Diefenbach; Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic; Ezra Markowitz; Renee N Salas; Keri K Stephens
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.626

5.  Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?

Authors:  Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Leah M Ranney; KyungSu Kim; Ellen E Jones; Emily Donovan; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-11

6.  Development and Application of an Interdisciplinary Rapid Message Testing Model for COVID-19 in North Carolina.

Authors:  Sophia M Bartels; Katherine Gora Combs; Allison J Lazard; Victoria Shelus; C Hunter Davis; Allison Rothschild; Maura Drewry; Kathryn Carpenter; Emily Newman; Allison Goldblatt; Nabarun Dasgupta; Lauren M Hill; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The effect of cigarillo packaging elements on young adult perceptions of product flavor, taste, smell, and appeal.

Authors:  Clare Meernik; Leah M Ranney; Allison J Lazard; KyungSu Kim; Tara L Queen; Aya Avishai; Marcella H Boynton; Paschal J Sheeran; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Communication Regulatory Science: Mapping a New Field.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Joseph N Cappella; Simani Price
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

9.  Effective Formats for Communicating Risks from Cigarette Smoke Chemicals.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Allison J Lazard; Ellen Peters; Huyen Vu; Annie Schmidt; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.