Literature DB >> 17406019

Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.

Ellen Peters1, Nathan Dieckmann, Anna Dixon, Judith H Hibbard, C K Mertz.   

Abstract

Much effort has been put into improving measures of health care quality. Although early research suggested that consumers made little use of quality reports, most reports were based on nonstandardized measures and were not user friendly. Information presentation approaches, however, will have a significant influence on what information is attended and used. The present research examines whether information presentation methods differentially influence consumers who differ in numeric skills. Results of three studies support the idea that "less is more" when presenting consumers with comparative performance information to make hospital choices. Results were particularly strong for those lower in numeracy, who had higher comprehension and made better choices when the information-presentation format was designed to ease the cognitive burden and highlight the meaning of important information. These findings have important implications for the sponsors of comparative quality reports designed to inform consumer decision making in health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17406019     DOI: 10.1177/10775587070640020301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  137 in total

Review 1.  Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Consumers' use of HCAHPS ratings and word-of-mouth in hospital choice.

Authors:  John W Huppertz; Jay P Carlson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Age differences in dual information-processing modes: implications for cancer decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Michael A Diefenbach; Thomas M Hess; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Medication adherence: a call for action.

Authors:  Hayden B Bosworth; Bradi B Granger; Phil Mendys; Ralph Brindis; Rebecca Burkholder; Susan M Czajkowski; Jodi G Daniel; Inger Ekman; Michael Ho; Mimi Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Larry Z Liu; John Musaus; William H Shrank; Elizabeth Whalley Buono; Karen Weiss; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Impediments to adherence to post myocardial infarction medications.

Authors:  Nihar R Desai; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Andy S L Tan; Daniel D Matlock; Barry Saver; Kathleen M Mazor; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 9.  Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Valerie F Reyna; Angela Fagerlin; Isaac Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-08-02

10.  Linking numeracy and asthma-related quality of life.

Authors:  Andrea J Apter; Xingmei Wang; Daniel Bogen; Ian M Bennett; Rebecca M Jennings; Laura Garcia; Tamie Sharpe; Carmen Frazier; Thomas Ten Have
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.