Literature DB >> 31414036

Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?

Kristen L Jarman1, Sarah D Kowitt2, Tara L Queen1, Leah M Ranney2, KyungSu Kim1, Ellen E Jones3, Emily Donovan4, Adam O Goldstein5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is required under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to communicate the risks of tobacco use to the public. Little research exists about methods to communicate the constituents of tobacco in a media campaign. This research examines specific strategies to increase effectiveness of a media campaign for cigarette smoking adults about tobacco constituents by including engagement text about smoking cessation and FDA as the source of the campaign.
METHODS: In an eye tracking study of 211 current cigarette smokers, participants randomly viewed 4 cigarette constituent messages that varied engagement text for quitting (benefits of quitting and quitline number, presence, absence) and by FDA source (presence, absence). After the eye tracking session, participants were asked about recall of the national quitline number and the source of message.
RESULTS: Participants in conditions with engagement text were significantly more likely than those in the no engagement conditions to recall the national quitline number. Few participants saw or recalled the FDA source.
CONCLUSIONS: Engagement text for smoking cessation on constituent communication campaign messages significantly increases recall of the quitline, an important resource for smokers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cigarette constituents; quitline; source credibility; tobacco communication

Year:  2018        PMID: 31414036      PMCID: PMC6693861          DOI: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Regul Sci        ISSN: 2333-9748


  42 in total

1.  Impact of the new EU health warnings on the Dutch quit line.

Authors:  M C Willemsen; C Simons; G Zeeman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Public preferences for an attribution to government or to medical research versus unattributed messages in cigarette warning labels in Israel.

Authors:  Nurit Guttman; Hannah Peleg
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2003

3.  Long-term benefit of increasing the prominence of a quitline number on cigarette packaging: 3 years of Quitline call data.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Judy Li; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; Jo Peace
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2010-08-27

4.  The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a comparison of standard scoring and latent class analysis approaches.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Beth A Reboussin; James C Anthony
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks.

Authors:  Barry R Manor; Evian Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Motivating goal-directed behavior through introspective self-talk: the role of the interrogative form of simple future tense.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Dolores Albarracín; Kenji Noguchi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09

7.  Adolescents' attention to traditional and graphic tobacco warning labels: an eye-tracking approach.

Authors:  Emily Bylund Peterson; Steven Thomsen; Gordon Lindsay; Kevin John
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2010

8.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

Review 9.  Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective.

Authors:  E J Strahan; K White; G T Fong; L R Fabrigar; M P Zanna; R Cameron
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number.

Authors:  C L Miller; D J Hill; P G Quester; J E Hiller
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  6 in total

1.  Should Graphic Warning Labels Proposed for Cigarette Packages Sold in the United States Mention the Food and Drug Administration?

Authors:  Mia Jovanova; Chris Skurka; Sahara Byrne; Motasem Kalaji; Amelia Greiner Safi; Norman Porticella; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Eye tracking applied to tobacco smoking: current directions and future perspectives.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Maurizio Codispoti
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.349

3.  An Eye Tracking Study of Anti-Smoking Messages on Toxic Chemicals in Cigarettes.

Authors:  Leah M Ranney; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kristen L Jarman; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Quitline Information Included on Cigarette Packaging: An Assessment of Country Adherence to WHO FCTC Guidelines, 2007 to 2018.

Authors:  Christopher M Seitz; Kenneth D Ward; Zubair Kabir
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Characterising trusted spokespeople in noncommunicable disease prevention: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Anastassia Demeshko; Lisa Buckley; Kylie Morphett; Jean Adams; Roger Meany; Katherine Cullerton
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-28

6.  Effect of Cigarette Constituent Messages With Engagement Text on Intention to Quit Smoking Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Adam O Goldstein; Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kyung Su Kim; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Leah M Ranney
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.